Abstract
Earlier studies that have investigated the motivational basis of intergroup discrimination have focused on the contribution of self-esteem. We argue that this emphasis has led to neglect of alternative motives. In the present chapter, we seek to redress this state of affairs by drawing attention to the potential contribution of belonging. Two studies investigated the link between belonging and two forms of intergroup discrimination (evaluations and allocations). Study one found that New Zealanders who evaluated in-group members (i.e., New Zealanders) more positively than out-group members (i.e., Asians) experienced enhanced belonging. Study two found that New Zealanders with high and low levels of belonging allocated more white noise to Asians than New Zealanders. Baseline respondents did not show this pattern. Following this display, respondents experienced significantly enhanced belonging. These results indicate that when New Zealanders express distinct forms of discrimination (i.e., evaluations and the allocation of noxious stimuli) against Asians, they report higher feelings of belonging. Such findings help us understand the motives behind intergroup discrimination.