Logo image
Ostracism and Inclusion: Negative In-Group Favoritism and Belonging
Book chapter   Open access

Ostracism and Inclusion: Negative In-Group Favoritism and Belonging

Olivia Scobie, Scarlett Wright, Roger Yan, Ted Ruffman, Damian Scarf and John A. Hunter
Power, Politics and Influence: Exercising Followership, Leadership, and Practicing Politics, pp.309-333
Springer Studies on Populism, Identity Politics and Social Justice, Springer Nature Switzerland
01/01/2025
Handle:
https://hdl.handle.net/10523/44399

Abstract

Belonging Negative discrimination Ostracism Self-esteem Social identity
This study investigates how negative in-group favoritism (the allocation of white noise) is associated with belonging in the minimal group paradigm. Participants were assigned to minimal groups and then randomly allocated to one of three Cyberball conditions (inclusion, ostracism, or no feedback). Subjective levels of belonging were then measured. Participants were then allowed to show in-group favoritism or fairness. Immediately after, this belonging was again measured. The results revealed that included and ostracized participants exhibited higher levels of in-group favoritism than those in the no-feedback condition. Notably, individuals who experienced inclusion displayed the most pronounced in-group favoritism. Additionally, an increase in the sense of belonging among ostracized individuals was directly associated with their engagement in-group favoritism. The ramifications of these findings are discussed.
url
https://rdcu.be/d5p2RView
Published (Version of record)Free to read via Springer Nature SharedIt InitiativeAll Rights Reserved Open

Metrics

62 Record Views

Details

Logo image