Abstract
While most litigants pursuing pseudolaw arguments appear unrepresented, some appear with assistance or representation. What should the court’s response be to those litigants who have assistants or representatives helping them advance a pseudolaw argument? A judicial officer faced with this question will be considering duties to the fair and efficient administration of justice in their courtroom. This chapter considers the difficult decision a judicial officer must make when faced with what I refer to as a ‘pseudolaw advocate’, a non-litigant who assists a litigant advance a pseudolaw argument.