Abstract
Objectives: Facilitated group supervision (FGS) involves small groups of professionals meeting monthly under the guidance of a supervisor to discuss workplace challenges and enhance reflective practice. This pilot study examined how a group of New Zealand radiation therapists perceived FGS and compared it to previous supervision experiences.
Methods: This mixed-methods pilot study included seven radiation therapists at the Wellington Blood and Cancer Centre. Participants volunteered to take part in FGS and were asked to complete a Qualtrics questionnaire after 6 months. The questionnaire included the Clinical Supervision Evaluation Questionnaire, which features 14 statements rated on a Likert scale to evaluate group process, purpose and impact. It also included open-ended questions and demographic information.
Results: All seven radiation therapists completed the questionnaire. Both qualitative and quantitative data indicated that participants had positive perceptions of FGS. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data revealed that participants highly valued the role of the skilled facilitator, which they felt fostered valuable insights and coping strategies – more so than in their previous group supervision experiences. The environment was described as safe, which promoted reflective practice. Participants also appreciated discussing stressors with others facing similar challenges.
Conclusion: Overall, the findings showed a positive perception of FGS among all participants. They reported gaining useful insights from both the facilitator and their peers, which helped address clinical challenges and enhance their professional skills. All participants expressed interest in continuing with FGS and believed it could benefit other radiation therapy professionals as well.
Poster presentation.