Logo image
Does ADHD derive from dysfunction of Gray's behavioural inhibition system?
Doctoral Thesis   Open access

Does ADHD derive from dysfunction of Gray's behavioural inhibition system?

Sima Sadeghi
Doctor of Philosophy - PhD, University of Otago
University of Otago
2016
Handle:
https://hdl.handle.net/10523/6399

Abstract

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Behavioural Inhibition System EEG Stop Signal Task
ADHD is a common childhood disorder that has been classified into three subtypes (ADHDI,ADHD-H and ADHD-C) but may involve a spectrum of symptoms. Deficits in executivefunctions have been considered to be a major source of the disability associated with ADHD. Impairments in behavioural inhibition fundamental to executive functions have been hypothesized as the core of ADHD symptoms (Barkley, 1997b; Quay, 1997). This thesis tests whether ADHD deficits derive from dysfunction of Gray’s Behavioural Inhibition System (BIS). It does so by assessing the differences between ADHD-I, ADHD-C and control groups in their Goal Conflict Specific Rhythmicity (GCSR), a biomarker of BIS function(McNaughton, 2014; McNaughton, Swart, Neo, Bates, & Glue, 2013). Two studies were undertaken, one in New Zealand (initial study) and one in Iran (main study). They demonstrated that ADHD-C showed GCSR activity, at the right frontal site F8, similar to that in control groups. However, ADHD-I showed less GCSR activity than controls – consistent with BIS dysfunction. ADHD-I symptoms such as low levels of attention and arousal could be due to BIS under activity. However, hyperactivity and impulsivity symptoms in ADHD-C cannot be explained by BIS dysfunction as there was no evidence of abnormal BIS activity for ADHD-C in any of the studies. Behavioural Approach System (BAS) over-activity may better explain ADHD-C symptoms by producing a stronger tendency to approach and act. Given that ADHD-I differs from ADHD-C it follows that ADHD as a whole cannot be seen as a single homogenous entity, although both ADHD-I and ADHD-C may share a common factor. The distribution of GCSR, and other measures for the three diagnostic groups overlapped fairly strongly – supporting the concept of a multidimensional spectrum for ADHD symptoms rather than categorical divisions. ADHD-I and ADHD-C varied from the control to some extent in terms of the accuracy of responses and SSRTs. However, there was no difference between ADHD-I and ADHD-C regarding their behavioural outputs in the SST. Longer SSRTs for ADHD participants have been interpreted as action stopping problems that involve a different, anxiolytic insensitive, neural system from behavioural inhibition. This finding supports the idea of a common factor in ADHD-I and ADHD-C. Overall, both ADHD-I and ADHD-C share action stopping problems reflected by SSRTs. BAS abnormality might produce some ADHD-C symptoms. BIS abnormality might produce some ADHD-I symptoms. This thesis shows that BIS deficiencies are not sufficient to account for all cases of ADHD as hypothesized by Quay (1997)
pdf
SadeghiSima2016PhD.pdfDownloadView

Metrics

280 File views/ downloads
771 Record Views

Details

Logo image