Abstract
The primary aim of the present investigation was to examine the relationship between perceived control and distinct forms of intergroup discrimination (i.e., ‘evaluations and allocations’). Two studies were conducted. The first examined control as an outcome of intergroup discrimination. The second examined control as both an outcome and predictor of intergroup discrimination. Study 1 revealed that, participants who evaluated in-group members (i.e., ‘New Zealanders’) more positively than out-group (i.e., ‘Asians’) experienced an increased sense of control. These findings were replicated in Study 2. This study revealed New Zealanders who allocated more white noise to out-group members (i.e., ‘Asians’) than in-group members (i.e., ‘New Zealanders’) reported increased levels of control. Partial correlation revealed that these findings were not a function of group specific esteem, personal esteem, social identification or uncertainty. Study 2 which manipulated control via inclusion and exclusion feedback revealed that, in comparison to those in the baseline, participants with both lower and higher levels of control both showed increased discrimination. Intergroup discrimination was positively associated with increased control. The ramifications of these findings are discussed.