Abstract
This dissertation will examine the control of powers in the law of contract in light of the experiences of administrative law. Administrative law has a "structural relationship with power", with well- developed theories and curial techniques in relation to the supervision of decision-making. An important concept developed in recent years has been the growing recognition of deference. This dissertation will identify that underpinning the control of powers in contract law is a similar need to determine the appropriate deference afforded to a contractual decision-maker. The curial techniques that control the exercise of powers in contract law involve a similar allocation of power between the courts and the primary decision-maker. Finally, it will comment on the growing recognition of doctrinal deference techniques in contract. It notes that, while there are significant issues with current approaches, doctrinal deference may provide a plausible model for the control of contractual powers.