Abstract
We present results from a 7-day trial of a Bluetooth-enabled card by the New Zealand Ministry of Health to investigate its usefulness in contact tracing. A comparison of the card with traditional contact tracing, which relies on self-reports of contacts to case investigators, demonstrated significantly higher levels of internal consistency in detected contact events by Bluetooth-enabled cards with 88% of contact events being detected by both cards involved in an interaction as compared to 64% for self-reports of contacts to case investigators. We found no clear evidence of memory recall worsening in reporting contact events that were further removed in time from the date of a case investigation. Roughly 66% of contact events between trial participants that were indicated by cards went unreported to case investigators, simultaneously highlighting the shortcomings of traditional contact tracing and the value of Bluetooth technology in detecting contact events that may otherwise go unreported. At the same time, cards detected only 65% of self-reported contact events, in part due to increasing non-compliance as the study progressed. This would suggest that Bluetooth technology can only be considered as a supplemental tool in contact tracing and not a viable replacement to traditional contact tracing unless measures are introduced to ensure greater compliance.