Abstract
Studies of thermal sensitivity in ectotherms require accurate measurements of body temperature using a reliable device, including in field situations. In this study, we tested the accuracy of a compact and inexpensive mini-infrared thermometer (mini-IRT, 22.3 g) at close distance (within 5 mm) for measuring skin surface temperature of small lizards or their models (painted copper bars). First, we used copper bars to assess the effect of model width on the accuracy of the measurement. We placed the heated models on a cool background, and then surface temperatures were measured with a mini-IRT for comparison with a thermogram from an infrared camera (IRC). We also assessed the accuracy of the mini-IRT for measuring skin temperature for two species of small lizards in the laboratory and in the field, in comparison with the skin surface temperature measured with the IRC and with cloacal temperature measured with a thermocouple thermometer. Our results with inanimate models show that the accuracy of the mini-IRT at a distance within 5 mm is biologically acceptable (within +/- 1.0 degrees C of the mean value obtained using a more expensive, calibrated device) when the width is >= 7 mm. For live lizards, we observed highly significant relationships between skin surface temperature measured with the mini-IRT and temperatures measured with the two other devices. The mean discrepancies between the mini-IRT and other devices were acceptably small for geckos but larger for the smaller and more slender skinks. Taken together, our results suggest that skin temperature measured with the mini-IRT at a close distance is acceptable for field studies on lizards with an abdominal width >= 7 min, serving as an inexpensive proxy for core body temperature in situations where portability and affordability of equipment and minimal animal handling are paramount. Nonetheless, calibration of mini-IRTs before use is strongly recommended.