Logo image
Assessment of children’s sleep using thigh-worn Axivity AX3 accelerometers
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Assessment of children’s sleep using thigh-worn Axivity AX3 accelerometers

Maja Sulstad Johansen, Esben Høegholm Lykke, Anders Grøntved, Peter Lund Kristensen, Jesper Schmidt-Persson, Sarah Overgaard Slater, Sofie Rath Mortensen, Kim Meredith-Jones, Rachael Taylor and Jan Christian Brønd
Sleep science and practice, Vol.10(1), 21
24/04/2026
Handle:
https://hdl.handle.net/10523/50753

Abstract

Accelerometry Actigraphy Validation Polysomnography Sleep assessment Sleep/wake cycles Children Adolescents Machine learning Wearable sensors
Background: Accurate assessment of sleep is vital, but the gold standard, polysomnography, is costly and impractical for large-scale studies. An alternative is wearable accelerometers, which reduce participant burden and avoid biases associated with subjective reporting e.g. recall biases. This study aimed to develop and validate a method for estimating time in bed (TIB), total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency (SE), sleep onset latency (SOL), and wake after sleep onset (WASO) utilizing machine learning applied to thigh-accelerometry data. Methods: Data on 309 nights from 134 children aged 4–17 years was used to develop a method utilizing two machine learning models applied to data from thigh-worn accelerometers to estimate sleep metrics. Inputs were collected simultaneously from the Zmachine Insight + and raw data from thigh-worn accelerometers, trained using k-fold cross-validation and validated in a participant-disjoint internal hold-out set. The method was then externally validated against polysomnography in an independent sample of 136 children aged 8–16 years. Results: The independent validation showed overestimations of 28.0 min for bedtime and 11.2 min for wake time, with ICC of 0.59 and 0.55. TIB and TST were overestimated by 14.0 and 3.3 min with ICC of 0.59 and 0.56, respectively. The correlation for estimating SE, SOL and WASO was weak with ICC of 0.21, 0.01 and 0.04, respectively. Conclusions: This method demonstrated sufficient accuracy for assessing bedtime, wake time, TIB and TST at the group level when validated in an independent sample against polysomnography, although wide limits of agreement suggest limited precision for individual-level assessments. Low agreement for SE, SOL and WASO indicated insufficient accuracy of the method for these metrics.
pdf
s41606-026-00183-w1.54 MBDownloadView
Published (Version of record) Open Access CC BY-NC-ND V4.0
url
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41606-026-00183-wView
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY-NC-ND V4.0

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image