Logo image
Baby Food Pouches, Baby-Led Weaning, and Iron Status in New Zealand Infants: An Observational Study
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Baby Food Pouches, Baby-Led Weaning, and Iron Status in New Zealand Infants: An Observational Study

Neve H. McLean, Jillian J. Haszard, Lisa Daniels, Rachael W. Taylor, Benjamin J. Wheeler, Cathryn A. Conlon, Kathryn L. Beck, Pamela R. von Hurst, Lisa A. Te Morenga, Jenny McArthur, …
Nutrients, Vol.16(10), 1494
15/05/2024
Handle:
https://hdl.handle.net/10523/40239

Abstract

infants iron status complementary feeding baby food pouches baby-led weaning New Zealand
Iron deficiency in infants can impact development, and there are concerns that the use of baby food pouches and baby-led weaning may impair iron status. First Foods New Zealand (FFNZ) was an observational study of 625 New Zealand infants aged 6.9 to 10.1 months. Feeding methods were defined based on parental reports of infant feeding at "around 6 months of age": "frequent" baby food pouch use (five+ times per week) and "full baby-led weaning" (the infant primarily self-feeds). Iron status was assessed using a venepuncture blood sample. The estimated prevalence of suboptimal iron status was 23%, but neither feeding method significantly predicted body iron concentrations nor the odds of iron sufficiency after controlling for potential confounding factors including infant formula intake. Adjusted ORs for iron sufficiency were 1.50 (95% CI: 0.67-3.39) for frequent pouch users compared to non-pouch users and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.45-1.87) for baby-led weaning compared to traditional spoon-feeding. Contrary to concerns, there was no evidence that baby food pouch use or baby-led weaning, as currently practiced in New Zealand, were associated with poorer iron status in this age group. However, notable levels of suboptimal iron status, regardless of the feeding method, emphasise the ongoing need for paying attention to infant iron nutrition.
pdf
nutrients-16-01494-v2558.49 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of record) Open Access CC BY V4.0
url
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16101494View
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY V4.0

Metrics

Details

Logo image