Abstract
Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are traditionally managed with standard-of-care dressings, compression and appropriate adjunctive venous interventions for pathologic venous reflux. Due to pathophysiological complexity and underlying patient comorbidities, conducting randomised controlled trials to evaluate the comparative efficacy of advanced treatment modalities is difficult, as many patients would likely be excluded. This retrospective, pragmatic, real-world evidence (RWE) study compared the healing outcomes of VLUs treated with either ovine forestomach matrix (OFM) (n = 312) or collagen/oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC) (n = 239) in outpatient wound care centres. Unlike restrictive randomised controlled trials, minimal inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to create two treatment cohorts that reflected the general VLU population. The incidence (%) of closure was greater in OFM-treated VLUs at 12, 24 and 36 weeks, and this difference was significant at 24 and 36 weeks compared to collagen/ORC. Median time to wound closure was significantly faster (p = 0.045) in the OFM cohort (11.1 ± 0.6 weeks) compared to the collagen/ORC group (12.3 ± 1.0 weeks). Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that OFM-treated VLUs had a significantly greater probability of healing (up to ~40%). This RWE comparative efficacy study further substantiates the clinical benefit of OFM in the treatment of chronic wounds, such as VLU, in a real-world patient cohort.