Abstract
After the intense attention the relevance logic community and its friends gave to McCall's ideas on connexive implication during the late 1960s and nearly all the 1970s, studies on connexive principles faded in the 1980s. By the 1990s, Claudio Pizzi was the only person working systematically on them. In fact, the connexive principles seemed forgotten even by relevance logicians, once their main researchers. Moreover, these principles were never seriously considered by paraconsistent logicians outside the Australasian-centered movement, to mention the two brands of non-classical logic more akin to the ideas underlying the connexive principles. Maybe Richard Routley's vocal comments about the alleged uselessness of connexivity for paraconsistency contributed to that fate of connexive logics.