Abstract
Background
The literature regarding flash glucose monitoring (FGM)‐associated cutaneous adverse events (AE) is limited.
Objectives
This study among youth participating in a 6 month randomized controlled trial aimed to compare cutaneous AE between FGM and self‐monitored blood glucose (SMBG) use and evaluate premature FGM sensor loss.
Methods
Patients aged 13 to 20 years with type 1 diabetes were randomized to intervention (FGM and usual care) or control (SMBG and usual care). Participants self‐reported cutaneous AEs electronically every 14 days. Reports were analyzed to determine frequency, type, and severity of cutaneous AEs, and evaluate premature sensor loss.
Results
Sixty‐four participants were recruited; 33 randomized to FGM and 31 to control. In total, 80 cutaneous AEs were reported (40 in each group); however, the proportion of participants experiencing cutaneous AEs was greater in the FGM group compared to control (58% and 23% respectively, P = .004). FGM participants most frequently reported erythema (50% of AEs), while controls most commonly reported skin hardening (60% of AEs). For FGM users, 80.0% of cutaneous AEs were mild, 17.5% moderate, and 2.5% severe. Among controls, 82.5% of cutaneous AEs were mild and 17.5% moderate. One participant ceased using FGM due to recurring cutaneous AEs. Additionally, over 6 months, 82% of FGM participants experienced at least one premature sensor loss, largely unrelated to a cutaneous AE.
Conclusions
Cutaneous FGM‐associated AEs are common, and mostly rated as mild. However, the majority of users continued FGM despite cutaneous AEs. Awareness of cutaneous complications and mitigation measures may reduce cutaneous AEs and improve the overall experience of FGM.