Logo image
Development of The Process and Quality of Goal Setting (PGS) Scale: Content Validity for Preliminary Version
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Development of The Process and Quality of Goal Setting (PGS) Scale: Content Validity for Preliminary Version

Yuko Kawaguchi, Kounosuke Tomori, Tatsunori Sawada, Yuho Okita and William Levack
Asian journal of occupational therapy, Vol.22(1), pp.105-113
02/09/2026
Handle:
https://hdl.handle.net/10523/52431

Abstract

goal-setting measurement COSMIN
Introduction: The aim of this study is to develop a new measurement tool designed to assess the quality of both the process and outcomes of goal setting, referred to as the Process and Quality of Goal Setting (PGS). Method: The development process adhered to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. A draft version of the measurement was developed through literature review and interviews with 7 experts and 2 clients. Subsequently, two rounds of a Delphi web survey were conducted with 32 therapists, and face validity was tested with 30 clients. Results: Consensus on the PGS was reached, comprising 39 items categorized into four main sections: A) Before goal-setting (4 items, not scored), B-1) The goal-setting process (14 items), B-2) Description of the goals (12 items), and C) After goal setting (13 items). Conclusion: The PGS serves not only as an outcome measure to assess the effectiveness of goal-setting processes in rehabilitation and healthcare settings but also as an essential tool aimed at enhancing the quality of these practices. It provides healthcare professionals with a systematic approach to assess and refine goal-setting practices, ensuring they effectively meet clients' needs and preferences.
pdf
22_1051.30 MBDownloadView
Published (Version of record) Open Access CC BY V4.0
url
https://doi.org/10.11596/asiajot.22.105View
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY V4.0

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image