Abstract
Introduction: In 2012, the University of Otago Medical School in New Zealand amended high stakes examination questions to routinely include ethnicity. This policy change was prompted by the assessment committee, including the Māori subcommittee. This study aimed to examine the portrayal of Māori patients and to explore the impact of routine inclusion of ethnicity.
Methods: A quantitative description of demographic variables of examination questions and responses (role-model answers, multiple-response preferred answer, guidelines for markers) from a pre policy (2009–2011), post policy (2012–2013) and follow-up period (2018–2019) was undertaken. A qualitative content analysis of Māori examination questions was conducted with consideration of trends over time.
Results: The majority (98%) of examination questions did not report ethnicity prior to the 2012 policy, whereas around 80% of cases did post policy implementation. Three themes were identified: the non-adherent Māori patient, determinants of health and the patient assigned Māori ethnicity. Examination questions and responses that portrayed Māori as being non-adherent were more common prior to the implementation of the policy. Post policy, many questions did not require students to consider the relevance of ethnicity but presented an increase in social and cultural contextual information of the patient over time.
Conclusion: Policy implementation by the assessment committee led to less racist stereotyping and “othering” of Māori patients and prompted further refinement of social and cultural determinants of health over time. Future recommendations include increasing representation of Māori as a reflection of the increased burden of disease alongside representing intersectionality using other socio-cultural indicators.