Abstract
Objective: The first year of life is a critical period when nutrient intakes can affect long-term health outcomes. Although household food insecurity may result in inadequate nutrient intakes or a higher risk of obesity, no studies have comprehensively assessed nutrient intakes of infants from food insecure households. This study aimed to investigate how infant nutrient intakes and body mass index (BMI) differ by household food security.
Design: Cross-sectional analysis of the First Foods New Zealand study of infants aged 7-10 months. Two 24-hour diet recalls assessed nutrient intakes. "Usual" intakes were calculated using the Multiple Source Method. BMI z-scores were calculated using World Health Organization Child Growth Standards.
Setting: Dunedin and Auckland, New Zealand.
Participants: Households with infants (n=604) classified as: severely food insecure, moderately food insecure, or food secure.
Results: Nutrient intakes of food insecure and food secure infants were similar, aside from slightly higher free and added sugars intakes in food insecure infants. Energy intakes were adequate, and intakes of most nutrients investigated were likely to be adequate. Severely food insecure infants had a higher mean BMI z-score than food secure infants, although no significant differences in weight categories (underweight; healthy weight; overweight) were observed between groups.
Conclusions: Household food insecurity, in the short term, does not appear to adversely impact the nutrient intakes and weight status of infants. However, mothers may be protecting their infants from potential nutritional impacts of food insecurity. Future research should investigate how food insecurity affects nutrient intakes of the entire household.