Logo image
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis update, comparing the Australasian Interstitial Lung Disease Registry to the Australian Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Registry
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis update, comparing the Australasian Interstitial Lung Disease Registry to the Australian Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Registry

Michelle Chee, Yet Hong Khor, Dan Jackson, Wendy Cooper, Jason D'Costa, Sally de Boer, Adrienne Edwards, Samantha Ellis, Eli Gabbay, Henry Gallagher, …
Internal medicine journal
04/06/2026
Handle:
https://hdl.handle.net/10523/51378

Abstract

treatment profile Australian Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis registry Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis Australasian interstitial lung disease registry baseline characteristics
Background and aims: Real-world evaluation of clinical characteristics and treatment profile of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is needed to establish areas for improvement according to evidence-based recommendations. This study evaluated the clinical characteristics and treatment profile of patients with IPF from the Australasian ILD Registry (AILDR), comparing them to the Australian IPF Registry (AIPFR) cohort, to identify differences in baseline characteristics among IPF patients treated with antifibrotics and immunosuppressants. Methods: Consecutive patients with IPF enrolled between May 2016 and December 2023 from the AILDR and data of patients enrolled in the AIPFR between 2012 and 2016 were included. Results: A total of 842 and 647 patients with IPF were included from the AILDR and the AIPFR respectively. Both cohorts were male predominant (AILDR: 72.0%; AIPFR: 67.7%) of similar mean body mass index (AILDR: 29.2 ± 4.9 kg/m2; AIPFR: 28.7 ± 4.8 kg/m2). With regard to disease-targeted treatment, 572 (67.9%) and 108 (12.8%) participants of the AILDR cohort were on antifibrotic medications and immunosuppressants respectively. There were a total of 35.6% (n = 300) IPF patients on pirfenidone and 40.4% (n = 340) on nintedanib in AILDR. Only 146 (23%) of the AIPFR cohort were receiving antifibrotics. Of newly registered patients in 2016 (n = 18), 2020 (n = 71) and 2023 (n = 151), 50.0%, 18.3% and 15.2% respectively had received immunosuppressive therapy. Conclusion: Baseline demographics from the IPF cohorts for both AILDR and AIPFR are largely comparable, with increasing antifibrotic and decreasing use of immunosuppressants since 2016. Immunosuppressive therapy in IPF remains relatively higher than expected despite guideline recommendations.
pdf
Internal Medicine Journal - 2026 - Chee - Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis update comparing the Australasian Interstitial670.16 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of record) Open Access CC BY-NC-ND V4.0
url
https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70490View
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY-NC-ND V4.0

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image