Abstract
Background
Synoptic operative reports may improve reporting of key operative information. This study aimed to compare information included in synoptic reports with narrative notes following the introduction of a synoptic reporting system at a tertiary colorectal cancer referral centre.
Methods
A standardized synoptic template incorporating the operative fields in the Australasian Bi‐National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA) was introduced for colorectal cancer surgery at the host institution in 2017. Colorectal cancer patients were identified from a prospectively collected database to collate samples of synoptic and narrative operative reports for comparison. The primary outcome was reporting of colon and rectal cancer‐specific quality measures. Synoptic reporting of quality measures by clinician grade and uptake of synoptic reporting were also measured.
Results
Five hundred and ninety‐five operative reports were reviewed; 84% of all quality measures were included in synoptic reports and 43% in narrative reports describing colon cancer surgery (P <0.001). Synoptic reports describing rectal cancer surgery included 84% of quality measures with 40% reported in narrative reports (P <0.001). Reporting for most individual quality measures did not change depending on clinician experience. Synoptic reporting methods were used to document 80% of all colon cancer surgery and 84% of rectal cancer surgery.
Conclusion
Synoptic operative reports were superior to narrative reports in documenting quality measures. Synoptic reporting facilitates simultaneous data capture and bulk upload for audits including the BCCA. Development of synoptic operative reports standardized across Australasian colorectal cancer centres should be further investigated as a tool to facilitate collaborative audit and research.
Synoptic and narrative reporting of rectal cancer‐specific quality measures