Abstract
This paper responds to the provocation: to what extent are the discussions around the recognition and integration of tikanga into our common law similar to or different form other case studies around the world? Does the project of bijuralism in Aotearoa/NZ raise unique concerns, distinctions, or conceptualisations of law? I am particularly interested in the second part of the provocation; my focus in this response will be on how Indigenous visual conceptualisations of law can deepen our understanding of legal pluralism and bijuralism.