Logo image
Initial physical health assessment for psychosis in Australia and New Zealand: 2026 recommendations
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Initial physical health assessment for psychosis in Australia and New Zealand: 2026 recommendations

Nicola Warren, Cullen O’Gorman, Frances Dark, Susanna Every-Palmer, Sean Halstead, Nicole Korman, Julia Lappin, Sharon Lawn, Brian O’Donoghue, Shuichi Suetani, …
Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry
26/04/2026
Handle:
https://hdl.handle.net/10523/50709

Abstract

guideline medical organic Psychosis schizophrenia
Objective: Initial presentations of psychosis require a thorough physical health assessment to identify comorbidities, establish treatment safety and exclude organic causes of psychosis. Despite clinical consensus that these assessments are essential, global guidelines are variable and outdated. This work aimed to synthesise current evidence to inform updated recommendations for physical assessments in psychosis, balancing thorough investigation with practical applicability. Methods: A scoping review of physical health disorders associated with psychosis was conducted using PubMed, Embase and CINAHL. Separately, a systematic review of international guidelines from 2000 to 2025 was performed, extracting physical health assessment recommendations for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. A narrative analysis evaluated the clinical utility of identified investigations. Results: Eighty-four physical health disorders with potential psychotic presentations were identified, mostly rare and typically associated with other neurological or systemic features. There was significant heterogeneity in investigations advised by the 25 identified guidelines, outside of the common consideration for metabolic screening. The majority of guidelines considered investigations for both the exclusion of organic causes of psychosis and identifying a physical health baseline or comorbidity. There was limited consistency around recommendations for neuroimaging or autoimmune screening. Clinical assessment remains central to determining appropriate investigations. Conclusion: Global inconsistency in assessment recommendations reflects the complexity of distinguishing organic psychoses from primary psychiatric disorders. Structured yet individualised assessments, informed by symptomatology and risk factors, are essential. A staged, context-sensitive approach is proposed to optimise diagnostic accuracy and avoid unnecessary testing. Updated, evidence-informed guidelines are critical for improving care for people with psychosis.
pdf
warren-et-al-2026-initial-physical-health-assessment-for-psychosis-in-australia-and-new-zealand-2026-recommendations645.35 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of record) Open Access CC BY V4.0
url
https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674261435740View
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY V4.0

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image