Abstract
The Child Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (CEBQ) is designed to measure ‘usual’ eating behaviour, with no time period attached, thus may not be suitable for assessing the effectiveness of short-term experimental studies. The aim of this study was to validate i) the CEBQ adapted to measure ‘past week’ rather than ‘usual’ eating behaviour, and ii) a computerized questionnaire assessing desire to eat core and non-core foods, against an objective measure of eating behaviour and food intake (eating in the absence of hunger (EAH) experiment). Children (n = 103) aged 8–12 years completed the desire to eat questionnaire followed by the EAH experiment while primary caregivers completed the adapted CEBQ. Results from the CEBQ showed that children with greater ‘satiety responsiveness’ (1-point higher) consumed less energy (−342 kJ; 95% CI -574, −110) whereas those with greater ‘enjoyment of food’ scale consumed more energy (380 kJ; 95% CI 124, 636) during the ad-libitum phase of the EAH experiment. Higher scores for slowness in eating (−705 kJ; 95% CI -1157, −254), emotional undereating (−590 kJ; 95% CI -1074, −106) and food fussiness (−629 kJ; 95% CI -1103, −155) were associated with lower total energy intake. Children who expressed greater desire to eat non-core foods consumed more energy in total (275 kJ; 95% CI 87, 463). Overall, this adapted CEBQ appears valid for measuring several short-term eating behaviours in children. The desire to eat questionnaire may be useful for identifying short-term susceptibility to overeating, however further investigation into how ratings of desire relate to the intake of highly palatable, energy dense foods is warranted.