Abstract
Perceptually, there is a discrepancy between research evidence and clinical physiotherapy practice for supporting self-management in people with low back pain (LBP).
This study aimed to explore physiotherapists’ understanding of LBP; ascertain their knowledge of self-management concepts; and explore their attitudes and beliefs about supporting self-management for LBP within present physiotherapy practice in private and hospital settings.
Interpretive Description qualitative methodology, involving in-depth data interpretation to clinical practice, was used.
Semi-structured interviews with physiotherapists throughout New Zealand were conducted via video conferencing. Data was analysed and themes were defined.
Seventeen physiotherapists (24–65 years old), with between one and 40+ years of experience, participated. Four main themes were defined: 1) Evolving understanding of LBP, 2) apportioning responsibility, 3) self-management is important, 4) understanding self-management.
Novel findings from this research demonstrate examples of attitudes and beliefs that determine when and how self-management for people with LBP is implemented. Due to these attitudes and beliefs, physiotherapists may not consistently provide supported self-management for people with LBP. Participants had good understanding of LBP but lacked a contemporary knowledge of the natural history and tended to apportion responsibility for persistent or recurrent episodes to the person with LBP. Physiotherapists should be encouraged to assimilate more contemporary research evidence into their expectations of recovery for LBP. Further education about the role of physiotherapists in supporting self-management, the core components of self-management, including engagement, and reflection upon individual unconscious bias should be encouraged.
•Novel findings demonstrate when and how LBP self-management is supported.•Participants lacked a contemporary knowledge of LBP natural history.•Responsibility for persistent or recurrent LBP was apportioned to the patient.•Participants lacked understanding of the core components of self-management.•Further education about effectively supporting self-management is required.