Abstract
Recent studies highlight the significant gaps in early-stage discussions within doctoral supervisory teams - especially in communication, role clarity, and work distribution within the doctoral supervisory team. These overlooked aspects can significantly impact the success of both supervisors and candidates. This study examines the tool's efficacy in facilitating early discussions among co-supervisors, focusing on Malaysia. The study investigates supervisors' perspectives on the tool's effectiveness in improving communication and fostering collaboration in co-supervision. Seven supervisory teams used the tool for six months, evaluating its impact. Thematic analysis showed improved communication and clearer task allocations, highlighting its potential to enhance collaboration and role clarity. However, the tool's ability to mitigate unequal power relationships among supervisors was limited.