Abstract
Advances in genome sequencing have enabled detailed microbiome analysis; however, the ideal specimen type for sequencing is yet to be determined. Rectal swabs may offer a rapid and convenient modality for colonic microbiome analysis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of rectal swabs compared to faecal specimens.
Twenty health professionals participated in this study and provided a faecal specimen, a self-collected rectal swab and a rectal swab taken by a clinician. DNA was extracted and 16S rRNA gene sequencing was carried out for microbiome analysis.
Alpha diversity was higher in swabs compared to faecal specimens; however, the difference was only significant when comparing clinician-obtained swabs to faeces.
Analysis of beta diversity consistently showed that few taxa were affected by sample type. We found sample type accounted for only 6.8% of community variation (R2 = 0.067, p < 0.001, permanova). Notably, there were only six genera identified in clinician-obtained swabs that were not also found in the self-taken swabs.
Both self-collected and clinician obtained rectal swabs are a reliable method of analysing the colonic microbiome. Obtaining specimens for microbiome analysis is often time-critical due to therapy, such as antibiotics, influencing the microbiome. Rectal swabs are shown to be a valid and convenient modality for microbiome analysis.