Logo image
Registration and reporting characteristics of trials investigating exercise therapy following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Registration and reporting characteristics of trials investigating exercise therapy following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Birk Mygind Grønfeldt, Rasmus S Husted, Rasmus H Brødsgaard, Line Holst, Thomas Kallemose, Cathy M Chapple, Carsten B Juhl and Thomas Bandholm
Acta orthopaedica, Vol.97, pp.408-416
22/06/2026
Handle:
https://hdl.handle.net/10523/51568

Abstract

Background and purpose: Prospectively registering the primary trial outcome is important to reduce selective outcome reporting and increase the trustworthiness of findings, which guide clinical practice. The objectives of our systematic review were to explore and compare the reporting characteristics of prospectively and non-prospectively registered trials investigating exercise therapy following total knee arthroplasty. Methods: Randomized trials comparing effects of exercise therapy after total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis were identified in 4 databases from 2000 to August 12, 2024. One primary outcome per trial was extracted, using a pre-specified hierarchical algorithm, irrespective of outcome domain. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated on pre-specified outcome domains, and risk-of-bias assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool v2. Results: 94 trials, comprising 9,396 participants, were included, of which 13 were prospectively registered, 33 retrospectively registered, and 48 unregistered. A single primary outcome was defined in 44% of the 94 trials, and 4 trials reported a primary outcome consistent with a prospective registration. The pooled SMD of primary outcomes was 0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.03 to 0.16) for prospectively registered trials, 0.67 (CI 0.22-1.11) for retrospectively registered trials, and 0.59 (CI 0.32-0.86) for unregistered trials. Lower risk-of-bias ratings and higher proportions of intention-to-treat adherence, dropout reporting, and adverse event reporting were observed among prospectively registered trials. Conclusion: Among prospectively registered trials we showed smaller effect size estimates between interventions with lower risk-of-bias ratings, and higher proportions of intention-to-treat adherence, dropout reporting, and adverse event reporting in contrast to trials without prospective registration; furthermore, clear specification of a single primary outcome was uncommon among trials evaluating exercise therapy after total knee arthroplasty.
pdf
19006-GRØNFELDT+D1,009.46 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of record) Open Access CC BY V4.0
url
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.46047View
Published (Version of record) Open CC BY V4.0

Details

Logo image