Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The goals were to determine optimal screening criteria for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in 7 neonatal units in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and to explore the workload implications of applying different criteria.
METHODS: Infants with birth weights of <= 2000 g or gestational age of <37 weeks were examined by 3 ophthalmologists in 7 of the largest units in Rio de Janeiro, during a 34-month period. ROP was classified by using the international classification, and laser treatment was given to infants developing type 1 ROP.
RESULTS: A total of 3437 (87%) of 3953 eligible infants were examined, of whom 124 (3.6% [range: 2.1%-7.8%]) were treated. Eleven infants were treated for aggressive posterior ROP. Appropriate screening criteria for the 2 NICUs with high survival rates (ie, >= 80% among infants with birth weights of <1500 g) would be <= 1500 g or <32 weeks. For NICUs with low survival rates (ie, <80%), appropriate criteria would be <= 1500 g or <= 35 weeks. UK, US, and previous Brazilian criteria would all miss infants needing treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: ROP programs in Brazil should use the wider criteria of <= 1500 g or <= 35 weeks until further evidence-based criteria become available, although this would mean a slight increase in workload across the city, compared with use of the narrower criteria in the better units. Whether survival rates can be used as a proxy to indicate screening criteria requires further investigation. Pediatrics 2010; 126: e410-e417