Abstract
Study design: Longitudinal cohort study.
Objectives: To estimate socioeconomic and work outcomes over 2 and a half years following spinal cord injury (SCI), and to compare those in receipt of compensation (Accident Compensation Corporation, ACC) and those not.
Setting: People admitted to the two spinal units in 2007-2009 in New Zealand, where there is a unique no-fault compensation scheme for injury.
Methods: Interviews were conducted at similar to 6, 18 and 30 months after SCI and data collected on pre-SCI and post-SCI health and socioeconomic characteristics. Poisson regression, quantile regression and a linear mixed model regression were used to compare differences in outcomes.
Results: Of the 162 eligible people, 118 (73%) participated and 91(77%) were followed to 30 months; 79% received ACC. Median personal income, self-reported standard of living and household income adequacy all fell slightly to 18 months and then stabilized at 30 months. At that time, 49% had returned to paid work. Among those not eligible for ACC, income fell to less than half the ACC group (P < 0.006 after adjustment), and return to work was lower (29% versus 54%).
Conclusion: The findings that most people retained their economic status and that return to work was relatively high appear to be due to the proportion entitled to the ACC no-fault compensation scheme for injury; with earnings-related compensation, a focus on rehabilitation to work and non-means-tested support services. This situation should mitigate against the downward spiral into poverty and further ill-health.