Abstract
Context: In most resource-rich countries, a large and growing proportion of older adults with complex needs will die while in a residential aged care (RAC) facility.
Objectives: This study describes the impact of facility size (small/large), ownership model (profit/nonprofit) and provider (independent/chain) on resident comfort, and symptom management as reported by RAC staff.
Methods: This retrospective "after-death" study collected decedent resident data from a subsample of 51 hospital-level RAC facilities in New Zealand. Symptom Management at the End-of-Life in Dementia and Comfort Assessment in Dying at End of life with Dementia (SM-EOLD and CAD-EOLD, respectively) scales were used by RAC staff who were closely associated with 217 deceased residents. Data collection occurred from January 2016 to February 2017.
Results: Results indicated that residents of large, nonprofit facilities experienced greater comfort at the end of life (CAD-EOLD) as indicated by a higher mean score of 37.21 (SD = 4.85, 95% CI = 34.4, 40.0) than residents of small for-profit facilities who recorded a lower mean score of 31.56 (SD = 6.20, 95% CI = 29.6, 33.4). There was also evidence of better symptom management for residents of chain facilities, with a higher mean score for symptom management (SM-EOLD total score) recorded for residents of chain facilities (mean = 28.07, SD = 7.64, 95% CI = 26.47, 29.66) than the mean score for independent facilities (mean = 23.93, SD = 8.72, 95% CI = 21.65, 26.20).
Conclusion: Findings suggest that there are differences in the quality of end-of-life care given in RAC based on size, ownership model, and chain affiliation.