Abstract
•The posterior SCJ dislocation is a potentially life-threatening injury secondary to the potential for vascular injury and massive haemorrhage.•Reductions should be performed in centres with collective experience with cardiovascular and interventional radiology presence.•Pre-emptive venous catheterisation should be performed in high-risk cases of potential venous avulsion or known venous injury.•Closed reduction of acute dislocations are most likely to be successful when performed within 48 h.•All drill holes have the potential for vascular injury, anteroposterior direction tunnels are less likely to result in fracture.
The posterior sternoclavicular joint dislocation is a rare and potentially life-threatening injury, as massive haemorrhage can occur at the time of trauma, during reduction manoeuvres and drilling. These injuries are rare and a collective experience of managing them is of paramount importance. We present our multidisciplinary experience of managing several of these injuries in our centre, with learning points we have identified.
Assessment should include Computerised Tomography Angiography (CTA) to assess the anatomy of the joint including the proximity to the underlying innominate vein and to identify any bleeding. Both closed reduction and open reconstruction have the potential for massive haemorrhage which can be controlled successfully with direct access to the underlying vessel. We recommend that all reductions should be performed in the presence of a cardiothoracic surgeon who can gain vascular control in the head, neck, and thorax. In specific high-risk cases, pre-emptive venous catheterisation can also be considered. We recommend that a discussion and rehearsal for intra-operative bleeding should be undertaken with the whole theatre team, with roles assigned pre-emptively and to allow identification of any deficiencies in staff expertise or equipment.
Of the five recent cases managed in our centre one patient had a closed reduction and four had open reductions. Success of closed reductions within 48 h is high and these can be attempted up to 10 days after injury. Our patient undergoing closed reduction had a favourable outcome and returned to professional rugby at five months. Open reduction was performed in a physeal fracture as there was a delay to surgery and callus had begun to form and had the potential to adhere to the underlying vessel. In this case we performed open reduction and stabilised with tunnelled suture fixation. Our preferred method of reconstruction uses a palmaris graft with internal figure of eight bracing. One patient had a subsequent fracture of the medial clavicle around the drill holes that healed without further intervention. Despite good reduction and stability achieved following palmaris reconstructions, two patients are experiencing ongoing symptoms of globus and one with voice change without any objective underlying cause.