Abstract
There is preliminary evidence to suggest that some published warfarin dosing algorithms produce biased maintenance dose predictions in patients who require higher than average doses. We conducted a meta‐analysis of warfarin dosing algorithms to determine if there exists a systematic under‐ or overprediction of dose requirements for patients requiring ≥7 mg/day across published algorithms. Medline and Embase databases were searched up to September 2015. We quantified the proportion of over‐ and underpredicted doses in patients whose observed maintenance dose was ≥7 mg/day. The meta‐analysis included 47 evaluations of 22 different warfarin dosing algorithms from 16 studies. The meta‐analysis included data from 1,492 patients who required warfarin doses of ≥7 mg/day. All 22 algorithms were found to underpredict warfarin dosing requirements in patients who required ≥7 mg/day by an average of 2.3 mg/day with a pooled estimate of underpredicted doses of 92.3% (95% confidence interval 90.3–94.1, I2 = 24%).