Australian Business Law Review, Vol.40, pp.213-216
2012
Handle:
https://hdl.handle.net/10523/8636
Abstract
Contract law Interpretation New Zealand Westpac v Chahil
This case note uses the decision of Westpac v Chahil to demonstate that the plain meaning of words can still prevail under the modern approach to contract interpretation.
Westpac v Chahil: Sometimes Words Just Mean What They Say
Creators
Simon Connell
Publication Details
Australian Business Law Review, Vol.40, pp.213-216
Academic Unit
Faculty of Law
Publisher
Thomson Reuters
Date published ; e-published
2012
Copyright
All items in OUR Archive are provided for research purposes and private study and are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.
Date copyright
2012
Language
English
Resource Type
Journal article
Format
application/pdf
Usage Policy
Usage details for all content viewed and downloaded in this site are shared with IRUS-UK (Institutional Repository Usage Statistics UK). Cookies are used to remember your decision. Click Accept to accept usage details sharing and the cookies.