Logo image
Telehealth with Children with Neurodisability: An infographic of a realist evaluation of what works, for who
Other learning objects   Open access

Telehealth with Children with Neurodisability: An infographic of a realist evaluation of what works, for who

Fiona Graham, Lena Sutherland and Morgan Curry
University of Otago
17/03/2022
Handle:
https://hdl.handle.net/10523/12775

Abstract

Telehealth Rehabilitation Qualitative Mixed methods Realist evaluation Child development Paediatric
Teledelivery of rehabilitation services has been proposed as a cost-effective option for supporting children with neurodisability and their families. However, little is understood of the conditions that support uptake of telehealth in paediatric rehabilitation, what is delivered during telehealth or perceptions of its outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify the context, process and outcomes of telehealth for children with neurodisability and their families. A secondary objective was to identify if variations in these aspects of telehealth occurred for Māori, the indigenous people of New Zealand. METHOD A mixed methods, three phase, realist evaluation identified context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOc) of telehealth. In phase one, the Determinants of Implementation Behaviour Questionnaire indicated factors affecting practitioner uptake of telehealth (Context). In phase two a casenote audit identified ‘practitioner input’ during telehealth (Mechanism). Phase three interviews with practitioners and parents explored ‘parent response’ to telehealth and, practitioner and parent perceptions of its value (Mechanism and Outcomes). Subgroup analyses for Māori were planned. RESULTS From phase one,practitioners (29/37, 78%) intended to use telehealth however few did so regularly (7/37, 22%). Positive experiences of telehealth were described by all practitioners (n=5) and families (n=7) in phase three. CMOc’s explained that practitioners’ offering of telehealth occurred when practitioners were confident, valued access to therapy over the familiarity of in-person delivery, and when practitioners used coaching-style communication. Parents were receptive to telehealth when they trusted practitioners, felt listened to and were offered telehealth as a choice. When telehealth occurred, access to therapy was timely, and more consistent than in-person delivery. Child outcomes appeared to be positive. Confidence in offering telehealth to Māori was low. CONCLUSIONS Initiatives to improve uptake of telehealth in paediatric rehabilitation should focus on creating conditions for practitioner implementation. Training in telehealth should include engagement with Māori. Adequate workspace and workplace culture change are required if telehealth is to be offered beyond the current ‘early adopters’.
png
Teleheatlh Infographic14-03-2022d.png336.44 kBDownloadView
Infographic Open Access CC BY-NC-ND V4.0

Metrics

96 File views/ downloads
498 Record Views

Details

Logo image