There will be an outage of OUR Archive from 12am to 8am on 25 October due to a vendor datacentre reorganisation. Access to OUR Archive will be impacted. We apologise for any inconvenience caused by this service interruption.

Logo image
Assessing the economic benefits of space weather mitigation investment decisions: Evidence from Aotearoa New Zealand
Preprint   Open access

Assessing the economic benefits of space weather mitigation investment decisions: Evidence from Aotearoa New Zealand

Edward J Oughton, Andrew Renton, Daniel Mac Manus, Dennies Bor and Craig J Rodger
ArXiv.org
Cornell University
15/07/2025
Handle:
https://hdl.handle.net/10523/47196

Abstract

Computer Science - Systems and Control Physics - Geophysics Physics - Physics and Society Physics - Plasma Physics Physics - Space Physics geomagnetic storms geomagnetic storm impacts New Zealand mitigation economic benefits of mitigation loss modelling
Space weather events pose a growing threat to modern economies, yet their macroeconomic consequences still remain underexplored. This study presents the first dedicated economic assessment of geomagnetic storm impacts on Aotearoa New Zealand, quantifying potential GDP losses across seven disruption and mitigation scenarios due to an extreme coronal mass ejection (CME). The primary focus is upon the damaging impacts of geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) on the electrical power transmission network. The goal is to support decision-making around space weather mitigation investments by providing a first-order approximation of their potential economic benefits. We find that in the absence of mitigation, a severe but realistic storm could result in up to NZ$8.36 billion in lost GDP, with more than half stemming from cascading supply chain effects. Yet, even less severe scenarios incur losses exceeding NZ$3 billion. Importantly, research-led operational strategies, such as optimized switching and islanding, can avoid up to NZ$370 million in losses for as little as NZ$500,000 in expenditure, delivering a benefit-cost ratio of 740 to 1. Moreover, physical protections such as GIC blocking devices further reduce disruption to as low as NZ$1.12 billion, with avoided GDP losses up to NZ$2.3 billion, and benefit-cost returns up to 80 to 1. When also acknowledging unmodelled impacts, including multi-billion losses in capital equipment and long-term revenue, the economic rationale for pre-emptive mitigation becomes even more pertinent. Future research needs to integrate the modelling of capital and revenue losses for strategically important industrial facilities.
pdf
2507.12495v13.30 MBDownloadView
Preprint (Author's original) v1 Open Access CC BY V4.0
url
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.12495View
Preprint (Author's original) Open CC BY V4.0

Metrics

229 File views/ downloads
110 Record Views

Details

Logo image