Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCurl, Angela
dc.contributor.authorFitt, Helen
dc.date.available2020-07-01T21:10:32Z
dc.date.copyright2020
dc.identifier.citationCurl, A., & Fitt, H. (2020). Same same, but different? Cycling and e-scootering in a rapidly changing urban transport landscape. New Zealand Geographer.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/10155
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores whether e-scooters can be considered similar to cycling in terms of their demographic appeal and skills required. Building on a social practices approach, we hypothesise that e-scootering and urban cycling may appeal to a similar demographic and require similar competencies. We draw on data from a 2019 survey of users and non-users of e-scooters. Respondents are not more likely to use an e-scooter if they have cycling experience. E-scooters seem to appeal to a broader demographic than cycling. Users are more likely to be young, able, males. Cycling experience is not associated with e-scooter competence.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherWileyen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofNew Zealand Geographeren_NZ
dc.subjectsocial practices; e-scooters; equity; transport technology; cyclingen_NZ
dc.titleSame same, but different? Cycling and e-scootering in a rapidly changing urban transport landscapeen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2020-07-01T05:06:54Z
otago.schoolDepartment of Population Healthen_NZ
otago.openaccessOpenen_NZ
dc.rights.statementThis article is the original submitted version of an article accepted for publication in New Zealand Geographer. This version differs from the final accepted and published version. [link here when available].en_NZ
dc.description.refereedPeer Revieweden_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record