Class Actions, Crown Negligence, Immunities and Epidemics on Trial
|dc.identifier.citation||Latu, A., & Young, S. (2020). Class Actions, Crown Negligence, Immunities and Epidemics on Trial. New Zealand Law Journal, 368–372.||en|
|dc.description||Might the Crown be held liable for permitting the incursion of a contagious disease into New Zealand, resulting in epidemic spread and significant economic loss? Should it be liable? While these questions might attract interest due to New Zealand’s COVID-19 response, and on-going outbreaks related to border controls, the Court of Appeal recently answered this question regarding a bacterial disease (Psa3) affecting kiwifruit in Attorney-General v Strathboss Kiwifruit Ltd  NZCA 98. In Strathboss the Court of Appeal found that the Crown was immune from liability in tort for the spread of the Psa3 bacterium amongst kiwifruit orchards in New Zealand, from 2010. This case is foremost a consideration of Crown immunity in tort, and secondarily an analysis of negligence. As the Supreme Court has granted leave to appeal on broad grounds (Strathboss Kiwifruit Ltd v Attorney-General  NZSC 68), we highlight aspects of the decision that require further scrutiny and clarification.||en_NZ|
|dc.relation.ispartof||New Zealand Law Journal||en_NZ|
|dc.rights||Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International||*|
|dc.title||Class Actions, Crown Negligence, Immunities and Epidemics on Trial||en_NZ|
|otago.school||University of Otago, Faculty of Law||en_NZ|
Files in this item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.
If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.