Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYoung, Stephen
dc.identifier.citationYoung, S. (2020). The Sioux Tribes’ continuing opposition to the DAPL. Māori Law Review, 3–12.en
dc.description.abstractStanding Rock Sioux Tribe v US Army Corps of Engineers (Standing Rock V) is the most recent in a series of cases where Sioux Tribes have challenged the legal authorisation for the Dakota Access Pipeline (“DAPL”) to protect the water flowing through their unceded ancestral lands. This note provides some of the background to explain why the various Sioux Tribes oppose the DAPL and the significance of Standing Rock V. In doing so, it showcases the complexity of administrative and environmental United States law that tribes must engage with as well as why this case, although limited in scope and likely a step towards additional rounds of litigation, is an important win for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe.en_NZ
dc.publisherMāori Law Reviewen_NZ
dc.relation.ispartofMāori Law Reviewen_NZ
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.subjectIndigenous peoplesen_NZ
dc.subjectSioux Tribesen_NZ
dc.subjectUnited Statesen_NZ
dc.subjectDakota Access Pipelineen_NZ
dc.subjectsettler stateen_NZ
dc.subjectextractive industriesen_NZ
dc.subjectancestral territoriesen_NZ
dc.titleThe Sioux Tribes’ continuing opposition to the DAPLen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
otago.schoolUniversity of Otago, Faculty of Lawen_NZ
dc.description.refereedPeer Revieweden_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International