Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlawi, Safeyaen_NZ
dc.date.available2011-04-07T03:09:21Z
dc.date.copyright2006-10-16en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationAlawi, S. (2006, October 16). International standards in the IT marketplace: How to bridge the gap and face the threats (Dissertation, Bachelor of Applied Science with Honours in Software Engineering). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/1157en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/1157
dc.description.abstractStandards development and adoption play a crucial role in shaping competition in the IT industry. In addition to the traditional, formal standards development organisations (SDOs), many private consortia bodies are formed and are seen to produce standards that are more competitive. International SDOs are well-respected because of the legitimacy of the standards that they develop. However, given the rapid nature of IT and the demands for standards to be set and released in pace with the industry rapidity, the traditional approach of standard development have been criticised over the years for being slow and bureaucratic and organisational reforms have been called for. Some believe that international standards are at the crossroads. This study examines the position of international standards against consortia standards. It aims to bring a perspective in which informal standards are seen as a complement to formal international standards, not a competitor. This paper contributes to the literature by combining the perspectives of different authors on both international and consortia standards. It is an exploratory research study that looks at the standardisation phenomena and the confrontation between ‘traditional’ and consortia standard-setting approaches from two perspectives: on one hand it analyses the nature of each standardisation approach, and on the other hand it examines the adoption of standards in the market and its trends. This paper is based largely on a comparative, critical survey of papers written about both international and consortia standardisation. Initial findings were validated and supplemented with insight gathered through personal interviews with people who encountered standards in their work experience. The findings from the literature illustrate an unbalanced portrayal in the way the tension between international standards and consortia standards is perceived. Findings lead to the conclusion that international standards will always have a role to play and should co-exist with consortia standards without losing their significance.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.subjectStandards developmenten_NZ
dc.subjectIT industryen_NZ
dc.subjectconsortia standardsen_NZ
dc.subjectformal international standards,en_NZ
dc.subject.lcshT Technology (General)en_NZ
dc.subject.lcshQ Science (General)en_NZ
dc.titleInternational standards in the IT marketplace: How to bridge the gap and face the threatsen_NZ
dc.typeDissertationen_NZ
dc.description.versionUnpublisheden_NZ
otago.bitstream.pages62en_NZ
otago.date.accession2007-03-01en_NZ
otago.schoolInformation Scienceen_NZ
thesis.degree.disciplineInformation Scienceen_NZ
thesis.degree.nameBachelor of Applied Science with Honours in Software Engineering
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Otagoen_NZ
thesis.degree.levelHonours Dissertationsen_NZ
otago.openaccessOpen
dc.identifier.eprints556en_NZ
otago.school.eprintsInformation Scienceen_NZ
dc.description.referencesAiken, R. J., & Cavallini, J. S. (1994). Standards: When Is It Too Much of a Good Thing? StandardView, 2(2), 110 – 119. Calderini, M. & Giannaccari, A. (2006). Standardisation in the ICT sector: the complex interface between antitrust and intellectual property. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 15, No. 6, September, pp. 543-567. Cargill, Carl F. (2001). The Role of Consortia Standards in Federal Government Procurements in the Information Technology Sector: Towards a Re-Definition of a Voluntary Consensus Standards Organisation,” testimony before the House Science Committee’s Subcommittee on Technology, Environment, and Standards. Cromer, T. & Horch, J. (1999). From the Many to the One - One Company's Path to Standardisation. Fourth IEEE International Symposium and Forum on Software Engineering Standards. p. 116. Egyedi, T. (2001). Beyond Consortia, Beyond Standardisation? New Case Material and Policy Threads Final Report. Delft University of Technology. Egyedi, T. (2003). Consortium Problem Redefined Negotiating 'Democracy' in the Actor Network on Standardisation, International Journal of IT Standards and Standardisation Research, Vol. 1 No, 2, July-Dec 2003. Glimstedt, H. (2000). Politics of Open Standards, Modular Innovation, and the Geography of Strategic Patenting in GSM and UMTS Technologies. Division of Innovation, Lund Institute of Technology. Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E. & Hatling, M. (1996), Developing information infrastructure standards: the tension between standardisation and flexibility. Science Technology and Human Values, Vol. 21 No.4, pp.407-26. Hawkins, R. (1999). The Rise of Consortia in the Information and Communication Technology Industries: Emerging Implications for Policy. Telecommunications Policy 23: 159-173. Hurd, J. & Isaak, J. (2005). IT Standardisation: The Billion Dollar Strategy. Journal of IT Standards and Standardisation Research, 3(1), 68-74. Lehr, W. (1992). Standardisation: Understanding the process. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43 (8), September 1992. Mattli, W (2001). The politics and economics of international institutional standards setting: an introduction. Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 3, pp. 328-344. NO-REST (Networked Organisations – Research into Standards and Standardisation). (2004). ANNEXE. Retrieved October 1, 2006, from NO-REST Editor Web site: www.no-rest.org/Documents/Annex.pdf. Pfleeger, S., Fenton, N. & Page, S. (1994). Evaluating software engineering standards. IEEE Computer, Sept, 1994, 71-79. RFC Editor. (2006). The Request for Comments (RFCs). Retrieved October 13, 2006, from RFC Editor Web site: http://www.rfc-editor.org/ Trade Agreement Act of 1979, U.S. Code, Title 19, sec. 2571. Definitions. Retrieved September 3, 2006, from: http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode19/usc_sec_19_00002571----000- .html van Wegberg, M. (2004) Standardisation and Competing Consortia: The Trade-off between Speed and Compatibility, International Journal of IT Standards & Standardisation Research, July-Dec., 2(2): 18 - 33. Weiss, T. (2006, May 22). IBM Plans to Support OpenDocument in Notes. Computerworld. Framingham, Vol. 40, Iss. 21; pg. 20. Werle, R. (2001). Institutional aspects of standardization - jurisdictional conflicts and the choice of standardization organizations. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(3), pp 392-410. Willingmyre, G. (1997). International Standards at the Crossroads. ACM StandardView, Vol. 5 No. 4. Zaninotto, E. (1998). Standards and standardisations on the eve of a new century. Standardview. ACM Perspectives on Standardisation, v. 6, n. 2, pp. 90-93.en_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record