Corporate social disclosure: Effect of perceptions on support of environmental group members
|dc.contributor.author||Aspinall, Rachal S||en_NZ|
|dc.identifier.citation||Aspinall, R. S. (2005, October 17). Corporate social disclosure: Effect of perceptions on support of environmental group members (Dissertation, Bachelor of Commerce with Honours). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/1191||en|
|dc.description.abstract||This study investigates the relationship between the perception of organisational corporate social and environmental disclosure (CSD) held by environmental group members and their support for organisations. Due to the significant costs associated with the provision of CSD, it is important to examine what benefits may or may not ensue from CSD provision. A review of the literature revealed a lack of research examining the views of CSD held by stakeholders. A specifically developed questionnaire was sent to members of six environmental groups listed on the Green Pages web-site. In total, 36 questionnaires were returned, limiting the results of the study. A regression analysis was undertaken, which revealed no significant relationship between perception and support. A lack of knowledge of CSD appears to constrain respondents’ perceptions. However, a negative feeling towards CSD was received from a number of respondents.||en_NZ|
|dc.subject.lcsh||H Social Sciences (General)||en_NZ|
|dc.title||Corporate social disclosure: Effect of perceptions on support of environmental group members||en_NZ|
|otago.school||Accountancy and Business Law||en_NZ|
|thesis.degree.discipline||Accountancy and Business Law||en_NZ|
|thesis.degree.name||Bachelor of Commerce with Honours|
|thesis.degree.grantor||University of Otago||en_NZ|
|otago.school.eprints||Accountancy & Business Law||en_NZ|
|dc.description.references||ACCA. (2004). Towards Transparency: progress on global sustainability reporting 2004. ACCA and CorporateRegister.com. ACCA. (2005). The Awards. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, 1st August 2005 from http://www.accaglobal.com/sustainability/awards/. Adams, C. (2002). Internal organisational factor influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15, 2, 223 - 250. Ahmad, N. & Sulaiman, M. (2004). Environmental disclosures in Malaysian annual reports: A legitimacy theory perspective. International Journal of Commerce & Management, 14, 1, 44 - 59. Antonacopoulou, E. & Méric, J. (2005). A critique of stake-holder theory: management science or a sophisticated ideology of control? Corporate Governance, 5, 2, 22 – 34. Azzone, G., Brophy, M., Noci, G. & Welford, R. (1997). A stakeholders’ view of environmental reporting. Long Range Planning, 30, 5, 699 - 709. Benston, G. (1982). Accounting and corporate accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 7, 2, 87 – 105. Boatright, J. (2001). The future of corporate social responsibility. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 20, 3 & 4, 39 – 48. Brown, L. (2003). Plan B: Rescuing a planet under stress and a civilisation in trouble. W.W. Norton & Company Limited, London, United Kingdom. Burke, R. (1984). Decision making in complex times: the contribution of a social accounting information system. Society of Management Accountants in Canada, Canada. Campbell, D., Craven, B. & Shrives, P. (2003). Voluntary social reporting in three FTSE sectors: A comment on perception and legitimacy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16, 4, 558 – 582. Clement, R. (2005). The lessons from stakeholder theory for U.S. business leaders. Business Horizons, 48, 3, 255 – 264. Commission of the European Communities. (2002). Communication from the Commission concerning Corporate Social Responsibility: A business contribution to Sustainable Development. Retrieved from the World Wide Web 13th October, 2005 from the World Wide Web at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/soc-dial/csr/csr2002_en.pdf. Dallal, G. (2000). How to Read the Output From Simple Linear Regression Analyses. Retrieved 3rd October 2005 from the World Wide Web at: http://www.tufts.edu/~gdallal/slrout.htm. Danastas, L., & Gadenne, D. (2004). A study of external pressure groups: Users of corporate social disclosure. Paper presented at the Fourth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference, Singapore, July. Dawkins, J., & Lewis, S. (2003). CSR in Stakeholder Expectations: And Their Implication for Company Strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 2/3, 185 – 193. Enticott, G. (2004). Multiple voices of modernization: Some methodological implications. Public Administration, 82, 3, 743 – 756. Environ. (2001). Report on a survey of environmental reporting costs and benefits. Report produced for The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Retrieved 10th August, 2003 from the World Wide Web at: http://www.resourcesaver.org/file/toolmanager/O16F26200.pdf. EnvironmentAwards.net. (2005). Selected Award Details. Retrieved 13th August, 2005 from the World Wide Web at: www.environmentawards.net/details.asp?cid=29. Epstein, M., & Freedman, M. (1994). Social disclosure and the individual investor. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 7, 4, 94 – 109. Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Times Magazine, September 30. Gibson, T. (2004). Sustainable Development Reporting: A Stakeholder’s Perspective. Unpublished Honours dissertation, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. Gould, C. (2002). Does stakeholder theory require democratic management? Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 21, 1, 3 – 20. Gray, R., Kouhy, R. & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8, 2, 47 - 77. Gray, R., Owen, D., & Maunders, K. (1988). Corporate Social Reporting: Emerging Trends in Accountability and the Social Contract. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 1, 1, 6 - 20. Gray, R., Owen, D., & Maunders, K. (1991). Accountability, Corporate Social Reporting, and the External Social Audits. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 4, 1 - 21. Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. (1989). Corporate social reporting: A rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 19, 76, 343 - 352. Hackston, D., & Milne, M. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9, 1, 77 - 108. Hall, J. (2002). An exploratory investigation into the corporate social disclosure of selected New Zealand companies. Discussion Paper Series 211, Massey University. Jensen, M. (2001). Value Maximisation, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14, 3, 8 – 21. Khor, A. (n.d.). Social Contract Theory, Legitimacy Theory and Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosure Policies: Constructing a Theoretical Framework. Retrieved 10th August 2005 from the World Wide Web at: www.ibe.org.uk/runner-up%20essay%20-%20undergrad%20category.pdf. Landry, P. (2005). Adam Smith. Retrieved 3rd October 2005 from the World Wide Web at: http://www.blupete.com/Literature/Biographies/Philosophy/Smith.htm#Wealth. McNamara, S. (2005). Time Budget Pressure in Auditing. Unpublished Honours dissertation, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. Management Issues News. (2003). Ethical consumers flex their muscles. Management Issues News, 08 December. Retrieved 6th August, 2005 from the World Wide Web at: http://www.management-issues.com/display_page.asp?section=research&id=1025. Mangos, N., & Lewis, N. (1995). A socio-economic paradigm for analysing managers’ accounting choice behaviour. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 8, 1, 38 – 62. Marketing Week. (2005). Insight – Ethics: Make the most of your ethics. Marketing Week, June 9, 30. Milne, M., & Adler, R. (1999). Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 12, 2, 237 – 256. Milne, M., & Chan, C. (1999). Narrative corporate social disclosures: How much of a difference do they make to investment decision-making? British Accounting Review, 31, 439 - 457. Newson, M., & Deegan, C. (2002). Global expectations and their association with corporate social disclosure practices in Australia, Singapore, and South Korea. The International Journal of Accounting, 37, 2, 183 - 213. O’Donovan, G. (2002). Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15, 3, 344 - 371. O’Dwyer, B. (2002). Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosures. An Irish story. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15, 3, 406 - 437. O’Dwyer, B., Unerman, J., & Bradley, J. (2005). Perceptions on the emergence and future development of corporate social disclosure in Ireland. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18, 1, 14 – 43. O’Dwyer, B., Unerman, J., & Hession, E. (2004). The emergence and future development of corporate social disclosure in Ireland: The perspectives of non-governmental organisations. Paper presented at the Fourth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference, Singapore, July. Ogrizek, M. (2002). The effect of corporate social responsibility on the branding of financial services. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 6, 3, 215 - 229. Owen, D., Swift, T., Humphrey, C. & Bowerman, M. (2000). The new social audits: Accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions? The European Accounting Review, 9, 1, 81 - 98. Owen, D., Swift, T., & Hunt, K. (2001). Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting. Accounting Forum, 25, 3, 264 - 282. Roberts, R. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17, 6, 595 – 612. Sekaran, U. (1992). Research Methods for business: a skill-building approach. Wiley, New York, United States of America. Sekaran, U. (2000). Research Methods for business: a skill-building approach, 4th edition. Wiley, New York, United States of America. Soanes, C., & Stevenson, A. (Eds.). (2004). Concise Oxford English Dictionary. Eleventh Edition, Oxford University Press, United States. Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 3, 571 – 611. Tarrant, D. (2005). Consumer ethics across cultures: Why consumers don’t care. Australian Graduate School of Management Magazine, 1. Retrieved 6th August 2005 from the World Wide Web at: http://www2.agsm.edu.au/agsm/web.nsf/Content/AGSMMagazine-ConsumerEthicsAcrossCultures. The Co-operative Bank. (n.d.). Who are the ethical consumers? Retrieved 6th August 2005 from the World Wide Web at: http://www.co-operativebank.co.uk/servlet/Satellite?blobcol=urlpdffile&blobheader=application/pdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=PDFFile&blobwhere=1082532276181&ssbinary=true. Tilt, C. (1994). The influence of external pressure groups on corporate social disclosure, some empirical evidence. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 7, 4, 47 - 72. Tilt, C. (Working Paper). Influences on corporate social disclosure: A look at lobby groups ten years on. Tippet, J. (2000). Investors’ perceptions of the relative importance of investment issues. Accounting Forum, 24, 3, 231 - 248. Unerman, J., & Bennett, M. (2004). Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 7, 685 – 707. University of California. (n.d.). Regression with SPSS. Retrieved 3rd October 2005 from the World Wide Web at: http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/spss/webbooks/reg/chapter1/annotated1.htm. Von Tunzelmann, A., & Cullwick, D. (1996). Social responsibility and the company: a new perspective on governance, strategy and the community. Institute of Policy Studies, Wellington, New Zealand. Woodward, D., Edwards, P., & Birkin, F. (2001). Some evidence on executives’ views of corporate social responsibility. British Accounting Review, 33, 357 – 397. www.biodiversity.govt.nz. Importance of a biodiversity strategy for New Zealand. Retrieved 28th September, 2004, from the World Wide Web at: http://www.biodiversity.govt.nz/picture/doing/nzbs/part-one/importance.html.||en_NZ|
Files in this item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.
If you would like to read this item, please apply for an inter-library loan from the University of Otago via your local library.
If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.