Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWoodcock, Richard Jamesen_NZ
dc.identifier.citationWoodcock, R. J. (2007). Intellectual capital disclosures by Australian companies (Dissertation, Bachelor of Commerce with Honours). Retrieved from
dc.description.abstractAustralia is shifting towards a knowledge-based economy. Even though there is an increasing emphasis on intellectual capital by Australian firms there is no mandatory intellectual capital disclosure standard. This suggests that what intellectual capital information Australian companies disclose is done voluntarily. This study examines whether this voluntary intellectual capital disclosure is occurring and whether a company’s characteristics influence the level of its intellectual capital disclosure by proposing two research questions. Firstly, what is the extent and content of voluntary intellectual capital disclosures by Australian companies? And secondly, what firm-specific characteristics are determinants of voluntary intellectual capital disclosures by Australian companies? Content analysis is used to gather data on intellectual capital disclosure levels and content of a sample of seventy listed Australian companies. Analysing the descriptive statistics of this data addresses this study’s first research question. In order to attend to the second research question five firm-specific characteristics are examined, industry classification, ownership concentration, leverage, listing age, and auditor type. Five hypotheses propose whether these five independent variables have an association with the level of intellectual capital disclosures or not. To operationalise the level of intellectual capital disclosure, as a dependent variable, the data gathered from the content analysis is utilised to calculate a disclosure index. Correlation and multiple regression analyses are performed to statistically test the five hypotheses. This study found that there is a limited awareness by Australian companies towards intellectual capital disclosures. The levels of intellectual capital disclosures were reasonably low and there was also inconsistency of the level of disclosure among firms. In terms of the content of disclosures, external capital was found to be the most frequently disclosed category of intellectual capital. This finding was consistent with previous intellectual capital disclosure studies in the Australian context. Through statistical testing, this study found that companies that operate in high intellectual capital intensive industries, and companies with a Big Four auditing firm disclose greater levels of intellectual capital information. It was found that a company’s ownership concentration, leverage level, and listing age do not influence its intellectual capital disclosure behaviour. The results of this study extend the scant research in this area of accounting, and they also provide practical implications for Australian accounting standard regulators.en_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHF5601 Accountingen_NZ
dc.titleIntellectual capital disclosures by Australian companiesen_NZ
otago.schoolAccountancy and Business Lawen_NZ and Business Lawen_NZ of Commerce with Honours of Otagoen_NZ Dissertationsen_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Only
dc.identifier.eprints767en_NZ & Business Lawen_NZ
dc.description.referencesBerger, A.N. and Bonaccorsi di Patti, E. (2006), “Capital structure and firm performance: A new approach to testing agency theory and an application to the banking industry”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 1065-1102. Berry, W.D. and Feldman, S. (1990), Multiple Regression in Practice, A Sage University Paper. Bozzolan, S., Favotto, F. and Ricceri, F. (2003), “Italian annual intellectual capital disclosure: An empirical analysis”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 4 No 4, pp 543-58. Brennan, N. (2001), “Reporting intellectual capital in annual reports: evidence from Ireland”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 423-36. Bukh, P.N., Nielsen, C., Gormsen, P. and Mouritsen, J. (2005), “Disclosure of information on intellectual capital in Danish IPO prospectuses”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 713-32. Chau, G.K. and Gray, S.J. (2002), “Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong and Singapore”, The International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 247-65 Choi, F.D.S. (1973), “Financial Disclosure and Entry into the European Capital Market”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 11 No. 2. Chow, C.W. and Wong-Boren, A. (1987), “Voluntary financial disclosure by Mexican corporations”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 62 No. 3, pp. 533-41. Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995), “A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 92-117. Coakes, S.J., Steed, L. and Dzidic, P. (2006), SPSS Analysis Without Anguish, Version 13.0, John Wiley, Australia. Cormier, D. and Gordon, I.M. (2001), “An examination of social and environmental reporting strategies”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 587- Cormier, D., Magnan, M. and Van Velthoven, B. (2005), “Environmental Disclosure Quality in Large German Companies: Economic Incentives, Public Pressures, or Institutional Conditions?”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 3-39. Deegan, C. (2002), “The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures- a theoretical foundation”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 282-311. Deegan, C.M. and Samkin, G. (2004), New Zealand financial accounting, McGraw-Hill, New Zealand. Fama, E.F. and Jensen, M.C. (1983), “Separation of Ownership and Control”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 301-236. Gelb, D. and Zarowin, P. (2000), “Corporate disclosure policy and the informativeness of stock prices”, working paper, New York University, New York, NY. Grojer, J.E. and Johanson, U. (1999), “Voluntary Guidelines on the Disclosure of Intangibles: A Bridge over Troubled Waters?”, paper presented at the International Symposium on Measuring and Reporting Intellectual Capital: Experiences, Issues and Prospects, June, Amsterdam. Guthrie, J. and Petty, R. (2000), “Intellectual capital: Australian annual reporting practices”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 241-51. Guthrie, J., Petty, R. and Ricceri, F. (2006), “The voluntary reporting of intellectual capital, Comparing evidence from Hong Kong and Australia”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 254-70. Guthrie, J., Petty, R., Yongvanich, K. and Ricceri, F. (2004), “Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 282-93. Guthrie, J., Petty, R., Yongvanich, K. and Ricceri, F. (2003), “Intellectual Capital Reporting: Content approaches to data collection”, Macquarie Graduate School of Management, Working Paper, Presented at Performance Measurement Association Intellectual Capital Symposium, Cranfield, UK, October 2003. Hamid, F.Z.A. (2005), “Malaysian companies’ use of the internet for investor relations”, Corporate Governance, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 5-14. Hossian, M., Perera, M.H.B. and Rahman, A.R. (1995), “Voluntary Disclosures in the Annual Reports of New Zealand Companies”, Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 69-87. Haniffa, R.M. and Cooke, T.E. (2002), “Culture Corporate Governance and Disclosure in Malaysian Corporations”, Abacus, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 317-49. Hunter, L., Webster, E. and Wyatt, A. (2005), “Measuring Intangible Capital: A Review of Current Practice”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 4-21. Jaccard, J. and Wan, C.K (1996), LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression, Sage Publications. Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976), “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 305-60. Krippendorff, K. (1980), Content Analysis. An Introduction to Its Methodology, The Sage CommText Series, Beverly Hills, CA. Lang, M. and Lundholm, R. (1993), “Cross-sectional determinants of analysts’ ratings of corporate disclosures”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 31, pp. 246-71. Milne, M.J. and Alder, R.W. (1999), “Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 237-56. Myers, S.C. (2001), “Capital Structure”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 81-102. Neuendorf, K.A. (2002), The Content Analysis Guidebook, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. Norusis, M.J. (1998), Guide to Data Analysis, SPSS 8.0, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. OECD Main Science and Technology Indicators (2006). Oliveira, L., Rodrigues, L.L. and Craig, R. (2006), “Firm-specific determinants of intangibles reporting: evidence from the Portuguese stock market”, Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 11-33. Oracle, Data Mining Concepts (2007) Accessed October 2007 Ordonez de Pablos, P. (2005), “Intellectual capital reports in India: lessons from a case study”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 141-49. Petty, R. and Cuganesan, S. (2005), “Voluntary Disclosure of Intellectual Capital by Hong Kong Companies: Examining Size, Industry and Growth Effects Over Time”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 40-50. Raffournier, B. (1995), “The determinants of voluntary financial disclosure by Swiss listed companies”, The European Accounting Review, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 261-80. Sekaran, U. (1992), Research Method of Business: a skill-building approach, Wiley, New York. Steenkemp, N. (2007), “Importance of Coding Pictures in ICR Content Analyses”, Paper presented at the APIRA Conference, 2007, New Zealand. Sujan, A. and Abeysekera, I. (2007), “Intellectual Capital Reporting Practices of the Top Australian Firms”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 71-83. Sveiby, K.E. (1997), The New Organisational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge Based Assets, Berrett-Koehler Pub. Inc., San Francisco. Walgrave, S. and Van Aelst, P. (2006), “The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory”, Journal of Communication, Vol. 56, pp. 88-109. Accessed 2006, Accessed 2006 Accessed 2006 Accessed 2006 Accessed September 2007 Accessed August 2007en_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you would like to read this item, please apply for an inter-library loan from the University of Otago via your local library.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record