The relationship between perceived environmental uncertainty, organizational structure, leadership style and the balanced scorecard
|dc.contributor.author||Zhao, Tianping Rose||en_NZ|
|dc.identifier.citation||Zhao, T. R. (2006). The relationship between perceived environmental uncertainty, organizational structure, leadership style and the balanced scorecard (Dissertation, Bachelor of Commerce with Honours). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/1222||en|
|dc.description.abstract||The primary intent of this dissertation is to provide some suggestions on what type of organizations suit better with the concept of balanced scorecards (BSC hereafter) than others in the New Zealand firm environment. To accomplish this attempt, a contingency approach, which takes into account the perceived environmental uncertainty, organizational structure, and leadership styles, is advocated. In this dissertation, several hypotheses are offered concerning the relationship between perceived environmental uncertainty, organizational structure and the BSC usage. Further, the relationship between leadership style and the BSC is also assessed. A questionnaire is distributed to a group of CFOs of selected New Zealand-owned companies in order to examine these proposed hypotheses. The results of this study suggest no significant relationship between perceived environmental uncertainty (PEU) and organizational structure. The statistics indicate that the BSC usages are not dependent on the internal corporate structure. Even though the last hypothesis is not supported due to the lack of clear presence of transformational and transactional leadership styles, the results of post hoc testing have captured a significant relationship between leadership and the BSC usages, suggesting that organizations with strong leaders tend to implement more advanced BSC. Despite several limitations, this study suggests practicing managers to consider their leadership before the BSC implementation. Further, future research is suggested to better understand the usage of the BSC in New Zealand companies.||en_NZ|
|dc.publisher||University of Otago|
|dc.title||The relationship between perceived environmental uncertainty, organizational structure, leadership style and the balanced scorecard||en_NZ|
|otago.school||Accountancy and Business Law||en_NZ|
|thesis.degree.discipline||Accountancy and Business Law||en_NZ|
|thesis.degree.name||Bachelor of Commerce with Honours|
|thesis.degree.grantor||University of Otago||en_NZ|
|otago.school.eprints||Accountancy & Business Law||en_NZ|
|dc.description.references||Ahn, H., (2001). Applying the balanced scorecard concept; an experience report, Long Range Planning, 34(4), Pp.441-461. Bass, B.M., (1985). Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations, Free Press, NY. Blundell, B., Sayers, H., & Shanahan, Y., (2003). The adoption and use of the balanced scorecard in New Zealand: a survey of the top 40 companies, Pacific Accounting Review, 15(1), pg.49-74. Burns, J.M., (1978). Leadership, Harper& Row, NY. Burns, T., & Stalker, G.M., (1961). The Management of Innovation, Tavistock. Carver, R.H., & Nash, J.G., (2005). Doing Data Analysis with SPSS: Version 12.0. Stonehill College. Downey, H., Hellriegel, D., & Slocum, J., (1975). Environmental uncertainty: the construct and its application, Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(4), Pp.613-629. Duncan, R.B., (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), Pp.313-327. Epstein, M., & Manzoni, J.F., (1998). Implementing corporate strategy: from Tableaux de Bord to balanced scorecards, European management journals, 16(2), Pp.190-203. Garson, G.D., (2006). Logistic Regression. [Websource] retrieved on 25th September 2006: http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/logistic.htm Gordon, L.A., & Narayanan, V.K., (1984). Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organisation structure: am empirical investigation, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(1), Pp.33-47. Hall, R. H., (1962). Intraorganizational structural Variation: An Application of the Bureaucratic Model, Administrative Science Quarterly, 7(3), Pp.295-308. Hendricks, K., Menor, L., & Wiedman, C., (2004a). Adoption of the balanced scorecard: a contingency variable analysis, Retrieved 19th September 2005 from: http://accounting.uwaterloo.ca/seminars/hendricksmenorwiedman.pdf Hickson, D.J., Hinnings, C.R., Lee, C.A., Schneck, R.E., Pennings, J.M., (1971). A Strategic Contingencies’ Theory of Intraorganizational Power, Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(2), Pp.216-229. Hinkin, T.R., & Tracey, B.T., (1994). The relevance of charisma for transformational leadership in stable organizations, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(2), Pp. 105-119. Retrieved 25th May 2006 from: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet?Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/0230120203.html Hopwood, A.G., (1974). Leadership climate and the Use of Accounting Data in Performance Evaluation, The Accounting Review, 49(3), Pp. 485-495. Hoque, Z., & James, W., (2000). Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: impact on organisational performance, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 12(1), Pp. 1-17. Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P., (1992). The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review, 70(1), Pp.71–80. Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P., (1996). The balanced scorecard, Harvard Business School Press, Boston. Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P., (1996a). Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System, Harvard Business Review, 74(1), Pp.75-85. Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P., (2000). The Strategy Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment, Harvard Business School Press, Boston. Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P., (2004). Strategy maps: converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes, Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, Boston. Kennedy, T., & Affleck-Graves, J., (2001). The impact of activity-based costing techniques on firm performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 13, Pp.19-46. Kloot, L., & Martin, J., (2000). Transforming performance management: A balanced approach to performance management issues in local government, Management Accounting Research, 11(2), Pp. 1-22. Lawrence, P.R., & Lorsch, J.W., (1967). Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), Pp.1-47. Lewy, C., (1998). Free University of Amsterdam; cited in McCunn, P., (1998). The balanced scorecard: the Eleventh Commandment, Management Accounting, December, Pp.34-37. Malmi, T. (2001). Balanced Scorecards in Finnish Companies: A research Note. Management Accounting Research, 12, Pp.207-220. McCall, C., (2001). An Empirical Examination of the Likert Scale: Some Assumptions, Development, and Cautions, Paper presented at the 80th Annual CERA Conference, Tahoe, CA. McCunn, P., (1998). The balanced scorecard: the Eleventh Commandment, Management Accounting, December, Pp.34-37. Miller, L., & Smith, K., (1983). Handling nonresponse issues, Journal of Extension, 21(5), Pp.45-50. Perrow, C. (1979). Complex organizations: a critical essay. Glenview. Pugh, D.S., Hickson, D.J., Hinings, C.R., & Turner, C., (1969). The Context of Organization Structures, Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(1), Pp. 91-114. Rigby, D., (2001). Management tools and techniques: a survey. California Management Review, 43(2), Pp.139-160. Schein, E.H. (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership, Jossey-Bass. Sharma, D.S., (2002). The differential effect of environmental dimensionality, size, and structure on budget system characteristics in hotels, Management Accounting Research, 13, Pp. 101-130. Silk, S., (1998). Automating the balanced scorecard, Management Accounting, 79(11), Pp.38-44. Smith, R., Olah, D., Hansen, B., & Cumbo, D., (2003). The effect of questionnaire length on participant response rate: A case study in the U.S. cabinet industry, Forest Products Journal, 53(11-12), p.33. Speckbacher, G.., Bischof, J., & Pfeiffer, T., (2003). A descriptive analysis on the implementation of balanced scorecard in German-speaking countries, Management Accounting Research, 14, Pp.361-387. Stedry, A.C., (1960). Budget control and cost behavior, Prentice-Hall. Tepper, B.T., & Percy, P.M., (1994). Structural validity of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, Education and Psychological Measurement, 54, Pp.734-744. Thompson, J.D., (1967). Organizations in Action, McGraw-Hill, New York. Waterhouse, J.H., & Tiessen, P., (1978). A Contingency Framework for Management Accounting Systems Research, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 3(1), Pp.65-76. Weick, K.E., (1969). The Social Psychology of Organizing; cited in Gorden, L.A. & Narayanan, V.K., (1984). Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organisation structure: am empirical investigation, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(1), p.34. Yukl, G.A. (1989). Leadership in Organizations, Prentice-Hall.||en_NZ|
Files in this item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.
If you would like to read this item, please apply for an inter-library loan from the University of Otago via your local library.
If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.