|dc.description.abstract||Recent government pressure and aspirations within the industry itself to improve financial stability, have seen credit unions pursue economies of scale to achieve this objective. This presented an opportunity to test the validity of this strategy. However, this study is uncommon, as it utilized the credit union population as the unit of analysis, rather than a sample, prevalent in other research. As a consequence this overcomes difficulties associated with multiple testings, and other statistical problems present in some other previous studies. By drawing upon two measures of operational efficiency, viz. operating costs to income and operating costs to total assets, inconclusive evidence of scale economies was found. While clear efficiency improvement occurred in moving from small to medium sized organisations, less compelling was the evidence of economies of scale in larger credit unions. Although the article followed a conventional cross-sectional methodology by examining performance at a moment in time, the study also adopted a longitudinal case study approach, by examining over time the efficiency of a large credit union. Finally, the measure used, inclusion or exclusion of outliers, and the operational efficiency ratio chosen, all effect the outcome, and either showed evidence of economies or diseconomies, of scale.||en_NZ
|dc.description.references||Cargill, T. F. and Vincell, D. C. (1969) Costs and profits of
California credit unions, presented at the Western
Economic Association, Long Beach California.
Cox, W. N. and Whigham, P. V. (1984) What distinguishes larger
and more efficient credit unions? Economic Review, Federal
Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 69, 34–40.
Ferguson, C. and McKillop, D. (1997) The Strategic Development
of Credit Unions, Wiley, Chichester.
Flannery,M. J. (1974) An economic evaluation of credit unions in
the United States, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Research
Report No. 54.
Fried, H. O. K., Lovell, C. A. and Von Eeckaut, P. (1993)
Evaluating the performance of US credit unions, Journal of
Banking and Finance, 17, 251–265.
Kim, H. Y. (1986) Economies of scale and economies of scope in
multiproduct financial institutions; further evidence from
credit unions, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 18,
Kohers, T. and Mullis, D. (1988) An update on economies of scale
in credit unions, Applied Economics, 20, 1653–9.
Koot, R. S. (1978) On economies of scale in credit unions, Journal
of Finance, 33(4), September, 1087–94.
McKillop, D., Ferguson, C. and Nesbitt, D. (1995) Paired difference
analysis of size economies in UK credit unions, Applied
Economics, 27, 529–37.
MacPherson, I. (1999) Hands Around the Globe, Horsdal and
Schubart, Victoria, BC.
Murray, J. D. and White, R. W. (1983) Economies of scale and
economies of scope in multiproduct financial institutions; a
studyof British Columbia credit unions, Journal of Finance,
Economies of scale in New Zealand credit unions 1263
Registrar of FriendlySocieties and Credit Unions (1999) Report
for the year ended 30 June 1999, Ministryof Commerce,
Registrar of FriendlySocieties and Credit Unions (1997) Credit
union annual reports for the year ended 30 June 1996,
Ministryof Commerce, Wellington.
Sibbald, A., Ferguson, C. and McKillop, D. (1999) A comparative
analysis of selected features affecting credit union industrydevelopment
with special reference to the UK and New
Zealand. Financial Services Research Forum, The Queen’s
Universityof Belfast and Universityof Ulster, http://
Smith, C. (1969) Credit unions in New Zealand, in Credit
Unions in the South Pacific: Australia, Fiji, New Zealand,
Papua New Guinea, N. Runcie, London UniversityPress,
Taylor, R. (1971) Economies of scale in large credit unions,
Applied Economics, 4, 33–40.
Wolken, J. D. and Navrath, F. J. (1980) Economies of scale in
credit unions: further evidence, Journal of Finance, 35(3)
World Council of Credit Unions (1996) Statistical Report,