Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrown, Benen_NZ
dc.date.available2011-04-07T03:14:46Z
dc.date.copyright2006-05en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationBrown, B. (2006, May). Sustainability at the Dunedin City Council (Dissertation, Master of Business). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/1345en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/1345
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this report was to challenge the Dunedin City Council to design policy and strategy that would enhance the long term sustainability of all aspects of the community. Following an initial background exploration of the Council's role in the community, the report examined a wide range of literature on organisational sustainability. It was revealed that while definitions of sustainability were highly varied and somewhat ambiguous, they could typically be categorised into three broad perspectives. Of these perspectives, the one that pertained to sustainability involving the incorporation of social and environmental concerns into the design of organisational strategy appeared to dominate business practice. Further analysis highlighted this that this 'weak' perspective of sustainability was also highly prevalent within the context of New Zealand business strategy and public sector legislation. The findings suggested that while the Council should be commended for the extensive community planning procedures it has in place, their policies and strategies were guided by the same `weak' perspective of sustainability expressed in the Council's external environment. The findings illustrated that this was primarily due to the fact that their approach to such issues was guided primarily by compliance with central government legislation. Importantly however, the research also showed that alternative interpretations of sustainability existed within the Council and as such there was little coherence or agreement as to what the concept meant for the Council. The findings suggested that this lack of coherence prevented any unitary vision for sustainability being established throughout Council policy and strategy which in turn hindered the Council from effectively enhancing all aspects of the community. Ultimately, the report acknowledged that while the Council had a reasonable grasp of sustainability concerns and applied these to a certain extent in the design of policy and strategy, there were several courses of action that could be taken to enhance this. These included: • Establishing programmes of ongoing organisational learning about sustainability • Creating opportunities for dialogue about sustainability • Developing a Local Agenda 21 approach to sustainability • Developing a unified definition of sustainability • Appointing a sustainability manager and working group • Providing a leadership role on sustainability for the community to follow In providing these recommendations the report advocated that their implementation would see the Council ascribe to a boarder understanding of sustainability which would be expressed in policy and strategy that better fulfils their commitments to enhancing the wellbeing of all aspects of the community.en_NZ
dc.subjectDunedin City Councilen_NZ
dc.subjectlong term sustainabilityen_NZ
dc.subjectincorporation of social and environmental concernsen_NZ
dc.subjectorganisational strategyen_NZ
dc.subjectbusiness strategyen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHF Commerceen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHF5601 Accountingen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshH Social Sciences (General)en_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHD Industries. Land use. Laboren_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHD28 Management. Industrial Managementen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHD61 Risk Managementen_NZ
dc.titleSustainability at the Dunedin City Councilen_NZ
dc.typeDissertationen_NZ
dc.description.versionUnpublisheden_NZ
otago.date.accession2006-12-12en_NZ
otago.schoolManagementen_NZ
thesis.degree.disciplineManagementen_NZ
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Business
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Otagoen_NZ
thesis.degree.levelMasters Dissertationsen_NZ
otago.interloanyesen_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Only
dc.identifier.eprints503en_NZ
otago.school.eprintsManagementen_NZ
dc.description.referencesAngell, L. & Klassen, R. (1999). Integrating Environmental Issues into the Mainstream: An Agenda for Research in Operations Management. Journal of Operations Management. 17, 575-598. Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge: Polity. Brugmann, J. (1996). Planning for Sustainability at the Local Government Level. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16, 363-379. Brundtland, G. (Ed.). (1987). Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cairns, J. (2001). Sustainability, Exceptionalism and Exemptionalism. Ecosystem Health, 7, (3), 147-154. Caliens, I. & Wolters, L. (1998). Factors of Unsustainability: Identification, Links and Hierarchy. Business Strategy and the Environment. 7, (1), 32-42. Carter, N. & Darlow, A. (1997). Local Agenda 21 and Developers: Are We Better Equipped to Build a Consensus in the 1990s? Planning Practice and Research, 12, (1), 45-57. Corbet, D. & Roberts, I. (2001). Leadership for Sustainable Development: Actions that Local Authorities are Taking to Mainstream Sustainable Development. United Kingdom: Greengage Consulting. Daly, H. & Cobb, J. (1989). For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Towards Community, the Environment and a Sustainable Future. London: Green Print. Dowding, K. (1995). Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach. Political Studies, 43, (1), 136-158. Dryzek, J. (1997). Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dunedin City Council. (2005). 2005/06 Annual Plan. Dunedin: Dunedin City Council. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals With Forks: The Triple Bottom Line for 21 st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing. Fineman, S. (1996). Emotional Subtexts in Corporate Greening. Organizational Studies, 17, (3), 479-500. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. New York: Basic Books. Gladwin, T., Kennelly, J. & Krause, T. (1995). Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research. Academy of Management Review, 20, (4), 874-907. Gray, R. & Bebbington, J. (2000). Environmental Accounting, Managerialism and Sustainability. Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management, 1, 1-44. Gray, R. & Milne, M. (2004). Towards Reporting on the Triple Bottom Line: Mirages, Methods and Myths. In Henriques, A. & Richardson, J. (Eds.). The Triple Bottom Line: Does it All Add Up?. London: Earthscan. Hajar, M. (1997). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernisation and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248. Hart, S. (1995). A Natural Resource-Based View of The Firm. Academy of Management Review. 20, (4), 986-1014. Hawkin, P., Lovins, A. & Lovins, L. (1999). Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. Boston: Little Brown. Heilbroner, R. (1986). The Essential Adam Smith. New York: W.W. Norton, Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture's Consequences, Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions and Organisations Across Nations. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives. (1994). Towards Sustainable Cities and Towns: Report of the first European Conference on Sustainable Cities and Towns. Germany: ICLEI. Knight, S. (2000). Agenda 21 in New Zealand: Not Dead, Just Resting. Australian Journal of Environmental Management, 7, (4), 213-222. Korten, D. (1999). The Post-Corporate World: Life after Capitalism. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Levinas, E. (1987). Time and the Other. (Cohen, R. Trans.). Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press. Local Government New Zealand. (2006). Local Government Exists for the Well-Being of Communities. Retrieved February 5 2006 from: http://www.Ignz.co.nz/about-us/. Lowe, I. (1998). Reporting on the State of the Environment. In Eckersley, R. (Ed.). Measuring Progress: Is Life Getting Better? Collingwood: CSIRO. McDonough, W. & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York: North Point Press. Marx, K. (1867). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vois I-III, (Trans. Fowkes, B. 1976). Harmondsworth: Penguin. Memon, A. & Perkins, H. (2000). (Eds.). Environmental Planning and Management in New Zealand. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press. Mercer, D. & Jotkowitz, B. (2000). Local Agenda 21 and Barriers to Sustainability at the Local Government Level in Victoria Australia. Australian Geographer, 31, (2), 163-181. Milne, M. (1996). On Sustainability, The Environment and Management Accounting, Management Accounting Research, 7, (1), 135-161. Milne, M. J. (2004). Business and Sustainability: Agenda for Challenge or Soothing Palliatives? Dunedin: University of Otago. Milne, M., Tregidga, H. & Walton, S. (2004). Playing with Magic Lanterns: The New Zealand Business Council for Sustainable Development and Corporate Triple Bottom Line Reporting, Proceedings of the 4th APIRA Conference, Singapore, July 4-6. Nelson, D. (1980). Frederick W. Taylor and the Rise of Scientific Management. Madison : University of Wisconsin Press. Newby, L. (1999). Sustainable Local Economic Development: A New Agenda for Action? Local Environment, 4, (1), 67-72. O'Connor, M. (1994). (Ed.). Is Capitalism Sustainable? Political Economy and the Politics of Ecology. New York: Guilford. O'Connor, M. (1998). Natural Causes: Essays on Ecological Marxism. New York: Guilford. Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment's Office. (2002). Creating our Future: Sustainable Development for New Zealand, Wellington: PCE. Pepper, D. (1996). Modern Environmentalism. An Introduction. London: Routledge. Perrow, C. (1997). Organizing for Environmental Destruction, Organisation & Environment, 10, (1), 66. Porter, M. E. & van der Linde, C. (1995) Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73, (5), 120-134. Prasad, A. (2003). (Ed.). Postcolonial Theory and Organizational Analysis: A Critical Engagement. New York: St. Martins Press. Redclift, M. (1996). Wasted: Counting the Cost of Global Consumption. London: Earthscan. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2003). Research Methods for Business Students. (3rd Ed.). London: Prentice Hall. Selman, P. D. (2000). A Sideways Look at LA21. Journal of Environmental Planning and Policy. 2, (1), 39-53. Senge, P. (1993). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation. London: Random House. Shrivastava, P. (1995). The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20, (4), 936-961. Simon, J. (1981). The Ultimate Resource. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Springett, D. (2003). Business Conceptions of Sustainable Development: A Perspective from Critical Theory. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12, 71-86. Stead, W. & Stead, J. (2004). Sustainable Strategic Management. New York: M.E Sharp. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. (1992). Agenda 21. New York: United Nations. Welford, R. (1998). Corporate Environmental Management, Technology and Sustainable Development: Post modern Perspectives and the Need for a Critical Research Agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 7, 1-12. White, L. (1967). The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis. Science, 155, 1203-1207.en_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you would like to read this item, please apply for an inter-library loan from the University of Otago via your local library.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record