Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWalshe, Sophiaen_NZ
dc.date.available2011-04-07T03:14:58Z
dc.date.copyright2006-03en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationWalshe, S. (2006, March). The theory and models of voting (Thesis). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/1371en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/1371
dc.description.abstractThis paper reviews the literature surrounding the area of voting research. Articles are usually focused on one area of voting research. Models of vote choice may include many variables but will usually be assessing the influence of one variable in particular. While this literature is vast, I have identified seven areas I found to be the subject of much interest to researchers. I discuss these using examples from the literature. Lastly, {have compiled a general comparison of various papers and publications, focusing on what each study considers to be the main determinant of vote choice.en_NZ
dc.subjectVotingen_NZ
dc.subjectvoting researchen_NZ
dc.subjectModels of vote choiceen_NZ
dc.subjectinfluenceen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHC Economic History & Conditionsen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshH Social Sciences (General)en_NZ
dc.subject.lcshJA Political science (General)en_NZ
dc.titleThe theory and models of votingen_NZ
dc.typeThesisen_NZ
dc.description.versionUnpublisheden_NZ
otago.bitstream.pages34en_NZ
otago.date.accession2006-10-02en_NZ
otago.schoolEconomicsen_NZ
thesis.degree.disciplineEconomicsen_NZ
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Otagoen_NZ
thesis.degree.levelMasters Thesesen_NZ
otago.interloanyesen_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Only
dc.identifier.eprints402en_NZ
otago.school.eprintsEconomicsen_NZ
dc.description.referencesAimer, P. and Vowles, J. (2003). What happened at the 2002 Election? [Revised version of a paper presented at the New Zealand Political Studies Association Conference, April 2003]. http://www.nzes.org/docs/papers/NZPSE_2003.pdf Alvarez, R.M. and Nagler, J. (1995). Economics, Issues and the Perot Candidacy: Voter Choice in the 1992 Presidential Election. American Journal of Political Science 39:3. Alvarez, R.M. and Nagler, J. (1998). When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections. American Journal of Political Science 42:1. Alvarez, R.M., Nagler, J. and Bowler, S. (2000). Issues, Economics, and the Dynamics of Multiparty Elections: The British 1987 General Election. American Political Science Review 94:1. Anderson, C.J., Mendes, S.M. and Tverdova, Y.V. (2004). Endogenous Economic Voting: Evidence from the 1997 British Election. Electoral Studies 23. Basinger, S.J. and Lavine, H. (2005). Ambivalence, Information and Electoral Choice. American Political Science Review 99:2. Bean, C. (1988) Class and Party in the Anglo-American Democracies: The Case of New Zealand in Perspective. British Journal of Political Science 18:3. Beck, P.A., Dalton, R.J., Greene, S. and Huckfeldt, R. (2002). The Social Calculus of Voting: Interpersonal, Media, and Organisational Influences on Presidential Choices. American Political Science Review 96:1. Blais, A., Turgeon, M., Gidengil, E., Nevitte, N. and Nadeau, R. (2004). Which Matters Most? Comparing the Impact of Issues and the Economy in American, British and Canadian Elections. British Journal of Political Science 34:3. Brennan, G. and Lomasky, L. (1993). Democracy and Decision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brooks, C. and Manza, J. (1997). Class Politics and Political Change in the United States, 1952-1992. Social Forces 76:2. Butler, D. and Kavanagh, D. (1992). The British General Election of 1992. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd. Butler, D. and Kavanagh, D. (1997). The British General Election of 1997. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd. Dow, J.K. (1999). Voter Choice in the 1995 French Presidential Election. Political Behaviour 21:4. Dow, J.K. and Endersby, J.W. (2004). Multinomial Probit and Multinomial Logit: A Comparison of Choice Models for Voting Research. Electoral Studies 23. Erikson, R.S. and Romero, D.W. (1990). Candidate Equilibrium and the Behavioural Model of the Vote. American Political Science Review 84:4. Evans, G. and Andersen, R. (2004). The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions: Evidence from the 1992-97 British Electoral Cycle. Nuffield College Politics Working Paper 2004-W9, University of Oxford. Fielding, D. (1998). The Social and Economic Determinants of Voter Behaviour: Evidence from the 1992 General Election in Scotland. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 45: 3 Fielding, D. (2000). Social and Economic Determinants of English Voter Choice in the 1997 General Election. Public Choice 102: 271-295 Geddes, A. and Tonge, J. (1997). Labour's Landslide. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (2001). Special Interest Politics. USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Hayes, B.C. (1997). Gender, Feminism and Electoral Behaviour in Britain. Electoral Studies 16:2. Karp, J.A. (2005). Political Knowledge About Electoral Rules: Comparing Mixed Member Proportional Systems in Germany and New Zealand. Electoral Studies 1:17. Keane, M.P. (1992). A Note on Identification in the Multinomial Probit Model. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10:2. Kriesi, H. and Sciarini, P. (2004). The Impact of Issue Preferences on Voting Choices in the Swiss Federal Elections, 1999. British Journal of Political Science 34:4. Leonard, D. and Mortimore, R. (2005). Elections in Britain: A Voter's Guide. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Maddala, G.S. (1983). Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Powers, D.V. and Cox, J.H. (1997). Echoes from the Past: The Relationship between Satisfaction with Economic Reforms and Voting Behaviour in Poland. American Political Science Review 91:3. Price, S. and Sanders, D. (1995). Economic Expectations and Voting Intentions in the UK, 1979-87: A Pooled Cross-section Approach. Political Studies, XLIII. Quinn, K,M., Martin, A.D. and Whitford, A.B. (1999). Voter Choice in Multi-Party Democracies: A Test of Competing Theories and Models. American Journal of Political Science 43:4, Roberts, K.M. and Wibbels, E. (1999). Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional and Structural Explanations. American Political Science Review 93:3. Rose, R. and McAllister, 1. (1986). Voters Begin to Choose. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Rose, R. and McAllister, I. (1990). The Loyalties of Voters, A Lifetime Learning Model. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Vowles, J., Aimer, P., Banducci, S., Karp, J. and Miller, R. (2004). Voters' Veto: The 2002 Election in New Zealand and the Consolidation of Minority Government. Auckland: Auckland University Press.en_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you would like to read this item, please apply for an inter-library loan from the University of Otago via your local library.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record