Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCarson, Guyen_NZ
dc.date.available2011-04-07T03:15:05Z
dc.date.copyright2005en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationCarson, G. (2005). The investment opportunity set and its proxies (Thesis). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/1385en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/1385
dc.description.abstractMyers (1977) describes the value of a firm as consisting of 2 things: assets in place and future investment options. He introduces the term 'Investment Opportunity Set' (IOS) to describe these options. In this paper, we have set out to identify the most appropriate proxy for the IOS using a range of single factor and multifactor techniques. Several recent studies do already use similar methods to examine the correlation between various proxies and an observable measure of the IOS over the following years (Kallapur and Trombley (1999), Baber, Janakiraman and Kang (1995), Adam and Goyal (2002)). The most common measure used previously for the IOS has been the future growth in the book value of the firm. This growth measures directly how the size of the firm in terms of book value increases, although it contains no information on how the market value of a firm is affected by future investments. This paper extends the existing literature by using a market-based measure for the IOS. Before starting it is important to define the IOS. Kallapur and Trombley (2001) define investment opportunities as options to invest in positive net present value (NPV) projects. They state that while some investment opportunities also result in an increase in the size of the firm, not all 'growth' opportunities have a positive NPV. Since all opportunities in the IOS have a positive NPV, investment will lead to an increase in value to shareholders, which ultimately should end up in the market value of the company.en_NZ
dc.subjectInvestment Opportunity Seten_NZ
dc.subjectassets in placeen_NZ
dc.subjectfuture investment optionsen_NZ
dc.subjectfuture growth in the book valueen_NZ
dc.subjectvalue to shareholdersen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHF Commerceen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHF5601 Accountingen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHG Financeen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHF5601 Accountingen_NZ
dc.titleThe investment opportunity set and its proxiesen_NZ
dc.typeThesisen_NZ
dc.description.versionUnpublisheden_NZ
otago.bitstream.pages38en_NZ
otago.date.accession2007-03-29en_NZ
otago.schoolFinanceen_NZ
thesis.degree.disciplineFinanceen_NZ
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Otagoen_NZ
thesis.degree.levelMasters Thesesen_NZ
otago.interloanyesen_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Only
dc.identifier.eprints567en_NZ
otago.school.eprintsFinance & Quantitative Analysisen_NZ
dc.description.referencesAdam, Tim, and Vidhan K. Goyal, 2002, The Investment Opportunity Set and its Proxy Variables: Theory and Evidence, Working Paper Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. Baber, William R., Surya N. Janakiraman, and Sok-Hyon Kang, 1996, Investment Opportunities and the Structure of Executive Compensation, Journal of Accounting and Economics 21, 297-318 Barber, Brad M., and John D. Lyon, 1997, Detecting Long-run Abnormal Stock Returns: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics, Journal of Financial Economics 43, 341-372. Chung, Kee H., and Stephen W. Pruitt, 1994, A Simple Approximation of Tobin's q, Journal of Financial Management 23, 70-74. Gayer, Jennifer J., and Kenneth M. Ga yer, 1993, Additional Evidence on the Association Between the Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies, The Journal of Accounting and Economics 16, 125-160. Jones, Jefferson P., Richard M. Morton, and Thomas F. Schaffer, 2000, Valuation Implications of Investment Opportunities and Earnings Performance, Review of Quantative Finance and Accounting 15, 21-35. Kallapur, Sanjay, and Mark A. Trombley, 1999, The Association Between Investment Opportunity Set Proxies and Realized Growth, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 26, 505-519 Kallapur, Sanjay, and Mark A. Trombley, 2001, The Investment Opportunity Set: Determinants, Consequences and Measurement, Managerial Finance 27, 3-15. Lyon, John D., and Brad M. Barber, 1999, Improved Methods for Tests of Long-Run Abnormal Stock Returns, Journal of Finance 54, 165-201, Mitchell, Mark L., and Erik Stafford, 2000, Managerial Decisions and Long-'berm Stock Price Performance. The Journal of Business 73, 287-329. Smith, Clifford W. Jr, arid Ross L. Watts, 1992, The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend , and Compcnsation Policies, Journal of Financial Economics 32, 263 – 292.en_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you would like to read this item, please apply for an inter-library loan from the University of Otago via your local library.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record