Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTemple, Benen_NZ
dc.identifier.citationTemple, B. (2006, March). How do countries’ incomes affect environmental quality? (Thesis). Retrieved from
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to investigate the relationship between economic growth and the environment using wider, more aggregated, indicators of ecosystem health than have been used in previous studies. This is done in an attempt to get a better picture of the global and diffuse impacts of economic activity on the biosphere. A general-to-specific (Gets) method is applied to estimate the relationship between three different proxies for environmental quality and various candidate regressors. While measures of SO2 and other point-source emissions may be decreasing for many developed nations, the validity of extrapolating to a general hypothesis about environmental quality in general may be exaggerated by the particular substitution possibilities between the chosen regressand and other potential alternatives. Globally diffuse impacts like CO2 emissions and habitat destruction are often argued to pose a more serious threat to ecosystem health, and the ability to substitute the use of some environmental services may be impossible or socially suboptimal. This represents a major objection to the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis, which suggests that the environment is initially degraded by economic growth, but beyond a point, improves with further development. Because of this fundamental criticism of the EKC literature (succinctly expressed by Arrow et al, 1995), indicators of degradation are assessed in terms of sustainability, particularly the tension between weak and strong views. To avoid the potential problems of multicollinearity, omitted variable bias (Stern et al, 1996, Stern and Common, 2001), and pollution displacement (Arrow et al, 1995, Stern et al, 1996), aggregate measures of environmental performance are investigated. Aggregation of environmental impact aims to capture all of the direct and indirect effects in the GDP/environment relationship at the macro level. Pollutant-specific data are often related to other indicators linked to industrial intensity. Movements in these variables may be caused by movements in other potential variables that are omitted from the regression equations. Aggregation based on many factors going in different directions will have a central tendency, and mitigates the possibility that substitution between impacts at the micro level distorts the growth-environment relationship from a sustainability perspective (Jha and Murthy, 2003b). Particular cumulative indexes examined include the Ecological Footprint (Global Footprint Network, 2005, Wackernagel et al, 1997), the Environmental Sustainability Index (Esty et al, 2005), and the Environmental Degradation Index (Jha and Murthy, 2003b), each investigated as an alternative proxy for environmental quality. These broader attempts to measure environmental performance and their congruence with well-known and established indicators of economic, institutional, and social/cultural phenomena are compared with some of the more common local pollutant data used in the existing empirical literature. To investigate an alternative methodology, the automated Gets approach, developed by Hendry and Krolzig (2001), is utilised. Its performance in the EKC research paradigm is carefully considered with a battery of diagnostic testing. The Gets method has significant appeal because the underlying theoretical literature behind EKCs is diverse in focus, allowing a wide range of candidate regressors as proxies for the possible forces at work. The theoretical basis of EKCs has been manifest as various explanations of observed data correlations, the starting point being an extrapolation of cross-country observations to single-economy, dynamic models. For that reason, model selection to square the theory with the data is crucial and the Gets emphasis on encompassing rival alternatives and diagnostic testing seems an improvement on the previously restrictive approaches to model selection. By applying a general-to-specific (Gets) approach to the econometric methods of estimating the income-environment relationship, emphasis is placed on diagnostic testing and the general need for congruence. An attempt to encompass previously conjectured relationships is attempted from the outset.en_NZ
dc.subjectenvironmental qualityen_NZ
dc.subjectEKC hypothesisen_NZ
dc.subjecteconometric formulationsen_NZ
dc.subjectGeneral Unrestricted Modelen_NZ
dc.subjectEcological Footprinten_NZ
dc.subjectSustainability Index measuresen_NZ
dc.subjectEnvironmental Degradation Indexen_NZ
dc.subjectEconomic growthen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHF Commerceen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHF5601 Accountingen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHC Economic History & Conditionsen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshH Social Sciences (General)en_NZ
dc.titleHow do countries' incomes affect environmental quality?en_NZ
otago.schoolEconomicsen_NZ of Otagoen_NZ Thesesen_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Only
dc.description.referencesAndreoni, J., and Levinson, A. (2001) The Simple Analytics of the Environmental Kuznets Curve, Journal of Public Economics 80(2), 269-86 Antweiler, W., Copeland, B.R., and Taylor, M.S. (2001) Is Free Trade Good for the Environment?, American Economic Review 91, 877-908. Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C.S., Jansson, B-0., Levin, S., Maler, K-G., Perrings, C., and Pimentel, D. (1995) Economic Growth, Carrying Capacity, and the Environment, Science 268, 520-521 Ayres, R.U. (1995) Economic Growth: Politically Necessary but Not Environmentally Friendly, Ecological Economics 15, 97-99 Ayres, R.U., van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., and Gowdy, J.M. (2001) Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Economics, Natural Science and 'Consilience', Environmental Ethics 23, 155-168 Birdsall, N. and Wheeler, D. (1993) Trade Policy and Industrial Pollution in Latin America: Where are the Pollution Havens? Journal of Environment and Development, 2(1), 137-49. Boulding, K.E. (1966) The Economics of the Corning Spaceship Earth, in Boulding, K.E. (1970) Beyond Economics: Essays on Society, Religion, and Ethics, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor Brock, W.A., and Taylor, M.S. (2003) The Kindergarten Rule of Sustainable Growth, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 9597 Brock, W.A., and Taylor, M.S. (2004) The Green Solow Model, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 10557 Chambers, N., Simmons, C., and Wackernagel, M. (2000) Sharing Nature's Interest: Ecological Footprints as an Indicator of Sustainability, Earthscan, London Cole, M.A. (2003) Development, Trade, and the Environment: How Robust is the Environmental Kuznets Curve? Environment and Development Economics 8, 557-580 Cole, M.A., and Elliott, R.J.R. (2003) Do Environmental Regulations Influence Trade Patterns? Testing Old and New Trade Theories, World Economy 26(8), 1163-86 Cole, M.A., Rayner, A.J., and Bates, J.M. (1997) The Environmental Kuznets Curve: An Empirical Analysis, Environment and Development Economics 2(4), 401-16 Common, M.S. (1995) Sustainability and Policy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Copeland, B.R., and Taylor, M.S. (2003) Trade and the Environment: Theory and Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton Daly, H.E. (1973) Towards a Steady-state Economy, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco Daly, M. (1978) Gynlecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism, Beacon Press, Boston Dasgupta, P.S., and Heal, G.M. (1979) Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge de Bruyn, S.M., van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., and Opschoor, J.B. (1998) Economic Growth and Emissions: Reconsidering the Empirical Basis of Environmental Kuznets Curves, Ecological Economics 25(2), 161-75 Dinda, S. (2004) Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey, Ecological Economics 49(4), 431-455 Ekins, P. (1997) The Kuznets Curve for the Environment and Economic Growth: Examining the Evidence, Environment and Planning A, 29, 805-830 Esty, D.C., Levy, M., Srebotnjak, M., and de Sherbinin, A. (2005) 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index: Benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship, Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, New Haven, available online at Report.pdf Ezzati, M., Singer, B.H., and Kammen, D.M. (2001) Towards an integrated framework for development and environmental policy: The dynamics of environmental Kuznets curves, World Development 29(8), 1421-1434 Friends of the Earth International (2001) Davos Forum's Environmental Sustainability Index "Deeply Flawed" Friends of the Earth International Press Release, January 26, 2001 Galli, R. (1998) The Relationship between Energy Intensity and Income Levels: Forecasting Long Term Energy Demand in Asian Emerging Countries, Energy Journal 19(4), 85-105 Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971) The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1975) Energy and Economic Myths, Southern Economic Journal, 41(3), 347-381 Global Footprint Network (2005) National Footprint and Biocapacity Accounts: 2005 Edition. Available at http://www, Griffin, S. (1978) Woman and Nature, Harper and Row, New York Grossman, G.M., and Krueger, A.B. (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, in The US-Mexico Free Trade Agreement, MIT Press, Cambridge Grossman, G.M., and Krueger, A.B. (1995) Economic growth and the environment, Quarterly Journal of Economics, May, 353-377 Gunderson, L.H., and Holling, C.S. (2002) Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Island Press, Washington, DC Gutes, M.C. (1996) The Concept of Weak Sustainability, Ecological Economics 17, 147-156 Gwartney, J.D., and Lawson. R.A. (2003) What Have We Learned for the Measurement of Economic Freedom? Paper presented at the Conference: The Legacy of Milton and Rose Friedman's Free to Choose, October 23-24, available online at http :// .pd f Gwartney, J., and Lawson, R. (2005) Economic Freedom of the World: 2005 Annual Report, The Fraser Institute, Vancouver. Data retrieved from Hahnel, R.E. (2002) The ABC's Of Political Economy: A Modern Approach, Pluto, London Hamilton, K. and Atkinson, G. (1996) Air Pollution and Green Accounts, Energy Policy 24(7), 675-684 Harbaugh, W.T., Levinson, A., and Wilson, D.M. (2002) Reexamining the Empirical Evidence for an Environmental Kuznets Curve, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(3), 541-551 Hartwick, J.M. (1977) Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources, American Economic Review, 67(5), 972-74 Hendry, D.F., and Krolzig, H.M. (2001) Automatic Econometric Model Selection using PcGets, Timberlake Consultants Ltd, London Hendry, D.F., and Krolzig, H.M. (2005) The Properties of Automatic GETS Modelling, The Economic Journal 115, 32-61 Hettige, H., Lucas, R.E.B., and Wheeler, D. (1992) The Toxic Intensity of Industrial Production: Global Patterns, Trends, and Trade Policy, American Economic Review 82, 478-481 Hoover, K.D., and Perez, S.J. (1999) Data Mining Reconsidered: Encompassing and the General-to-Specific Approach to Specification Search, Econometrics Journal 2(2), 167-191 International Country Risk Guide (2005) International Country Risk Guide, PRS Group, New York, available online at Jha, R., and Murthy, K.V.B. (2003a) A Critique of the Environmental Sustainability Index, Australian National University Departmental Working Papers 08, RSPAS Jha, R., and Murthy, K.V.B. (2003b) An Inverse Global Environmental Kuznets Curve, Journal of Comparative Economics 31, 352-368 Kaiser, H.F. (1958) The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis. Psychometrika 23, 187-200 Kaufmann, R.K., and Cleveland, C.J. (1995) Measuring Sustainability: Needed – An Interdisciplinary Approach to an Interdisciplinary Concept, Ecological Economics 15, 109- 112 Krautkraemer, J.A. (2005) Economics of Natural Resource Scarcity: The State of the Debate, Resources for the Future Discussion Paper Series 05-14 Krolzig, H.M., and Hendry, D.F. (2001) Computer Automation of General to Specific Model Selection Procedures, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25, 831-866 Kuznets, S. (1963) Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations, Economic Development and Cultural Change 11, 1-80. Lewan, L., and Simmons, C. (2001) The Use of Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity Analyses as Sustainability Indicators for Sub-national Geographical Areas: A Recommended Way Forward, Final report to the Oslo Workshop, available online at dev/tools/oslows/Use%20of%20EF%20for%20SGA %20-%20Main%20Report.doc Lewis-Beck, M.S. (1994) Factor Analysis and Related Techniques, Sage, London Lopez, R. and Mitra, S. (2000) Corruption, Pollution, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 40, 137-150 New Economics Foundation (2001) Davos Fiddles Figures - World Economic Forum `Statistical Abuse' Attacked for Defending US Pollution, New Economics Foundation Press Release, January 30, 2001 Owen, P.D. (2003) General to Specific Modelling using PcGETS, Journal of Economic Surveys 17(4), 609-628 Owen, P.D. and Weatherston, C.R. (2004) Uncertainty of Outcome and Super 12 Rugby Union Attendance, Journal of Sports Economics 5(4), 347-370 Panayotou, T. (1993) Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development, World Employment Programme Research Working Paper WEP 2-22/WP 238 Panayotou, T. (1997) Demystifying the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Turning a Black Box into a Policy Tool, Environment and Development Economics 2(4), 465-84 Panayotou, T. (2000) Economic Growth and the Environment, CID Working Paper No. 56 Pearce, D. (2000) Public Policy and Natural Resources Management, Draft paper for DGXI European Commission, Brussels available online at Pearce, D.W. and Atkinson, G.D. (1993) Capital Theory and the Measurement of Sustainable Development: An Indicator of Weak Sustainability, Ecological Economics 8, 103-108 Pearce, D.W., and Turner, R.K. (1990) Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment, Haryester Wheatsheaf, New York Plant, J. (1989) Healing the Wounds: The Promise of Ecofeminism, New Society Publishers, Philadelphia Ramos-Martin, J. (2003) Empiricism in Ecological Economics: A Perspective from Complex Systems Theory, Ecological Economics 46(3), 387-398 Rock, M.T. (1996) Pollution Intensity of GDP and Trade Policy: Can the World Bank Be Wrong?, World Development 24(3), 471-79 Rothman, D.S. (1998) Environmental Kuznets Curves – Real Progress or Passing the Buck? A Case for Consumption-Based Approaches, Ecological Economics 25, 177-194 Rothman, D.S., and de Bruyn, S.M. (1998) Probing into the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis, Ecological Economics 25, 143-145 Schmalensee, R., Stoker, T.M., and Judson, R.A. (1998) World Carbon Dioxide Emissions: 1950-2050, Review of Economics and Statistics 80(1), 15-27 Selden, T.M., and Song, D. (1994) Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curves for Air Pollution Emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26, 147-162 Sen, A. (1983) Development: Which Way Now?, Economic Journal 93(372), 742-62 Shafik, N., and Bandyopadhyay, S. (1992) Economic Growth and Environmental Resources, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 4, 1-24 Simon, J.L. (1981) The Ultimate Resource, Princeton University Press, Princeton Solow, R.M. (1974) The Economics of Resources or the Resources of Economics, American Economic Review, 66, 1-114 Solow, R.M. (1978) Resources and Economic Growth, American Economist 22(2), 5-11 Solow, R.M. (1986) On the Intergenerational Allocation of Natural Resources, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 88(1), 141-49 Stern, D.I. (1998) Progress on the Environmental Kuznets Curve? Environmental and Development Economics 3, 173-196 Stern, D.I. (2004a) The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve, World Development 32(8), 1419-1439 Stern D.I. (2004b) Energy and Economic growth, in: Cleveland, C. J. (editor) Encyclopedia of Energy, Academic Press, San Diego CA. Stern, D.I. and Common, MS. (2001) Is There an Environmental Kuznets Curve for Sulfur? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41, 162-178 Stern, D.I., Common, M.S., and Barbier, E.B. (1996) Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation: The Environmental Kuznets Curve and Sustainable Development, World Development, 24 (7) 1151-1160 Stiglitz, J.E. (1974) Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: Efficient and Optimal Growth Paths, Review of Economic Studies, 123-137 Suri, V., and Chapman, D. (1998) Economic Growth, Trade and Energy: Implications for the Environmental Kuznets Curve, Ecological Economics 25, 195-208 Temple, B. (2006) Is Economic Growth 'Good' For the Environment?, submitted as an Econ 590 project in partial fulfilment of a Master of Business in Economics, University of Otago, Dunedin The Ecologist (2001) Keeping Score - ESI - '2001 Environmental Sustainability Index', The Ecologist 31(3), 44-48 Torras, M., and Boyce, J.K. (1998) Income, Inequality and Pollution: A Reassessment of the Environmental Kuznets Curve, Ecological Economics 25, 147-160 Torras, M., and Boyce, J.K. (2002) Rethinking the environmental Kuznets Curve, in The Political Economy of the Environment, by Boyce, J.K., Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA UNDP (1999) Human Development Report 1999, United Nations Development Programme, available online at UNDP (2005) Human Development Report 2005, United Nations Development Programme, available online at van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., and Verbruggen, H. (1999) Spatial Sustainability, Trade, and Indicators: An Evaluation of the 'Ecological Footprint', Ecological Economics 29(1), 61-72 van Kooten, G.C., and Bulte, E.H. (2000) The Ecological Footprint: Useful Science or Politics? Sustainable Forest Management Network Working Paper 1999-25 Wackernagel, M. (2001) Shortcomings of the Environmental Sustainabili Index, Redefining Progress, February 10, available online at http://www.anti-lo, 20critique.rtf Wackernagel M., Onisto, L., Linares, A.C., Lopez I.S.F., Garcia, J.M., Guerrero, A.I.S., and Guerrero, M.G.S. (1997) Ecological Footprints of Nations. How Much Nature Do They Use? How Much Nature Do They Have?, available online at http://w w Wackernagel, M., and Rees, W.E. (1997) Perceptual and Structural Barriers to Investing in Natural Capital: Economics from an Ecological Footprint Perspective, Ecological Economics 2, 3-24 White, H. (1980) A Heteroskedastic-consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity, Econometrica 48, 817-838 World Bank (1992) World Development Report, World Bank, Washington DC World Bank (2000) World Development Indicators 2000, World Bank, Washington DC World Bank (2005) World Development Indicators 2005, World Bank, Washington DC, available online at
 Find in your library

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you would like to read this item, please apply for an inter-library loan from the University of Otago via your local library.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record