Accounting information disclosure decisions within a social contingency framework
Liyanarachchi, Gregory A.
This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.
If you would like to read this item, please apply for an inter-library loan from the University of Otago via your local library.
If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.
Cite this item:
Liyanarachchi, G. A. (2003, November). Accounting information disclosure decisions within a social contingency framework (Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/1480
Permanent link to OUR Archive version:
http://hdl.handle.net/10523/1480
Abstract:
Financial accounting disclosure decisions are made in a complex social environment. The Social Contingency Model (SCM) provides a suitable framework within which disclosure decisions can be examined. Consequently, this thesis examined the impact of accountability and participants' commitment to a disclosure policy on their mandatory and voluntary information disclosure decisions and the integrative complexity of thoughts that underlie these decisions. For this purpose, two laboratory experiments were conducted using senior accounting undergraduate students.
Contrary to the predictions of SCM, results of the two experiments indicate that accountability may lead to significantly different decisions only in certain disclosure decision tasks. Therefore, under what conditions and what type of decision tasks accountability may or may not have an impact, remain unclear. An increase in integrative complexity of thought appears to be necessary for participants to justify more information relating to the voluntary disclosures and less information relating to the mandatory disclosures. As the integrative complexity of thought may produce different outcomes with respect to different decision-tasks, when examining the impact of accountability on decisions the integrative complexity of thought needs to be recognised as an intervening variable. Furthermore, the results suggest that participants' commitment to a disclosure policy may have produced a blocking effect. The impact of commitment was positive on the integrative complexity of accountable-participants' thoughts on one disclosure scenario but negative on another. Consistent with the results relating to the impact of accountability on disclosure decisions, the type of task appears to be critical in understanding the impact of commitment on participants' disclosure decisions under accountability demands.
Student decision behaviour under accountability demands appears to be highly complex hence such demands must be used with caution when designing monitoring systems. Many factors, such as the type of decision-task and individuals' commitment to certain valued outcomes, may significantly interact with accountability demands. These combined effects may lead to desirable outcomes only in certain decision tasks. Finally, after much research, what is becoming clear about accountability demands is that the effect of holding people accountable for their decisions is highly complex. Therefore, an excessive reliance on accountability demands as a monitoring mechanism on the one hand and a lack of appreciation of the complex results such demands can produce on the other, may bring about serious unintended behavioural consequences.
Date:
2003-11
Advisor:
Theivananthampillai, Paul; MacGregor, Alan
Degree Name:
Doctor of Philosophy
Degree Discipline:
Accountancy and Business Law
Keywords:
Financial accounting disclosure; Social Contingency Model; (SCM); accountability; voluntary disclosures; mandatory
disclosures
Research Type:
Thesis
Notes:
276 leaves ; 23 cm. University of Otago department: Accountancy and Business Law. "November 2003".
Collections
- Thesis - Doctoral [3036]
- Accountancy and Finance [263]