Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorTheivananthampillai, Paul
dc.contributor.advisorMacGregor, Alan
dc.contributor.authorLiyanarachchi, Gregory A.en_NZ
dc.date.available2011-04-07T03:16:55Z
dc.date.copyright2003-11en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationLiyanarachchi, G. A. (2003, November). Accounting information disclosure decisions within a social contingency framework (Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/1480en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/1480
dc.description276 leaves ; 23 cm. University of Otago department: Accountancy and Business Law. "November 2003".
dc.description.abstractFinancial accounting disclosure decisions are made in a complex social environment. The Social Contingency Model (SCM) provides a suitable framework within which disclosure decisions can be examined. Consequently, this thesis examined the impact of accountability and participants' commitment to a disclosure policy on their mandatory and voluntary information disclosure decisions and the integrative complexity of thoughts that underlie these decisions. For this purpose, two laboratory experiments were conducted using senior accounting undergraduate students. Contrary to the predictions of SCM, results of the two experiments indicate that accountability may lead to significantly different decisions only in certain disclosure decision tasks. Therefore, under what conditions and what type of decision tasks accountability may or may not have an impact, remain unclear. An increase in integrative complexity of thought appears to be necessary for participants to justify more information relating to the voluntary disclosures and less information relating to the mandatory disclosures. As the integrative complexity of thought may produce different outcomes with respect to different decision-tasks, when examining the impact of accountability on decisions the integrative complexity of thought needs to be recognised as an intervening variable. Furthermore, the results suggest that participants' commitment to a disclosure policy may have produced a blocking effect. The impact of commitment was positive on the integrative complexity of accountable-participants' thoughts on one disclosure scenario but negative on another. Consistent with the results relating to the impact of accountability on disclosure decisions, the type of task appears to be critical in understanding the impact of commitment on participants' disclosure decisions under accountability demands. Student decision behaviour under accountability demands appears to be highly complex hence such demands must be used with caution when designing monitoring systems. Many factors, such as the type of decision-task and individuals' commitment to certain valued outcomes, may significantly interact with accountability demands. These combined effects may lead to desirable outcomes only in certain decision tasks. Finally, after much research, what is becoming clear about accountability demands is that the effect of holding people accountable for their decisions is highly complex. Therefore, an excessive reliance on accountability demands as a monitoring mechanism on the one hand and a lack of appreciation of the complex results such demands can produce on the other, may bring about serious unintended behavioural consequences.en_NZ
dc.subjectFinancial accounting disclosureen_NZ
dc.subjectSocial Contingency Modelen_NZ
dc.subject(SCM)en_NZ
dc.subjectaccountabilityen_NZ
dc.subjectvoluntary disclosuresen_NZ
dc.subjectmandatory disclosuresen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHF Commerceen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHF5601 Accountingen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHG Financeen_NZ
dc.subject.lcshHF5601 Accountingen_NZ
dc.titleAccounting information disclosure decisions within a social contingency frameworken_NZ
dc.typeThesisen_NZ
dc.description.versionUnpublisheden_NZ
otago.date.accession2006-09-04en_NZ
otago.schoolAccountancy and Business Lawen_NZ
thesis.degree.disciplineAccountancy and Business Lawen_NZ
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Otagoen_NZ
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral Thesesen_NZ
otago.interloanyesen_NZ
otago.openaccessAbstract Only
dc.identifier.eprints384en_NZ
otago.school.eprintsAccountancy & Business Lawen_NZ
dc.description.referencesAbdel-khalik, A.R. "On the efficiency of subject surrogation in accounting Research." The Accounting Review (October 1974): 743-750. Acland, D. "The effects of behavioural indicators on investor decisions: an exploratory study." Accounting, Organizations and Society 1 (1976): 133-142. Adair, J. G. "Meaning of the situation to subjects." American Psychologist 37 (1982): 1406-1408. Ahrens, T. "Styles of accountability." Accounting, Organizations and Society 21 (1996): 139-173. Anderson, R. and Epstein, M. "The usefulness of annual reports." Australian Accountant (April 1995): 25-28 Aronson, E. "Dissonance theory: Progress and problems." In Theories of cognitive consistency: A source book, edited by R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuir, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, and P.H. Tannenbaum. Rand-McNally, 1968. Aronson, E., Brewer, M., and Carlsmith, J.M. "Experimentation in social psychology." In Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by G. Lindzey and E. Aronson. Third edition. Random House: New York, 1985. Aronson, E. and Carlsmith, J.M. "Experimentation in social psychology." In Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by G. Lindzey and E. Aronson, 1-79. Second edition, Vol. 2. Reading: MA: Adison–Wesley, 1968. Ashton, R.H. "Pressure and performance in accounting decision settings: Paradoxical effects of incentives, feedback, and justification." Journal of Accounting Research 28 (Supplement 1990): 148-180. Ashton, R.H. "Effects of justification and a mechanical aid on judgment performance." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 52 (1992): 292-306 Ashton, R.H. and Kramer, S.S. "Students as surrogates in behavioral accounting research: Some evidence." Journal of Accounting Research 18 (1980): 1-15. Baker-Brown, G., Ballard, E.J., Bluck, S., De Vries, B., Suedfeld, P. and Tetlock, P.E. "The conceptual/integrative complexity scoring manual." In Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis, edited by C.P. Smith, 401-418. Cambridge University Press, 1992. Beach, L.R. and Mitchell, T.R. "A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies." Academy of Management Review 3 (1978): 439-449. Berkowitz, L. and Donnerstein, E. "External validity is more than skin deep." American Psychologist 37 (1982): 245-257. Birnberg, J.G. and Nath, R. "Laboratory experimentation in accounting research." The Accounting Review (January 1968): 38-45. Bloomfield, R. J. and Wilks, T.J. "Disclosure effects in the laboratory: Liquidity, depth, and the cost of capital." The Accounting Review 75 (2000): 13-41. Brehm, J. "Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 53 (1956): 384-389. Brehm, J. W. and Cohen, A.R. Explorations in cognitive dissonance. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1962. Brownell, P. Research Methods in Management Accounting. Coopers & Lybrand, Australia, 1995. Buchman, T. A., Tetlock, P. E., and Reed, R. 0. "Accountability and auditors' judgments about contingent events." Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 23 (1996): 379-398 Campbell, D.T. and Fiske, D.W. "Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix." Psychological Bulletin 56 (1959): 81-105. Campbell, D.T. and Stanley, J.C. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963. Carlsmith, J.M., Ellsworth, P.C., and Aronson, E. Methods of Research in Social Psychology. Addison-Wesley: Reading, Mass., 1976. Carnegie, G., Davies, S. & Gavens, J. "Segment reporting – material or not?" The Chartered Accountant in Australia 56 (1986): 50-53. CATREG, Version 1. Data Theory Scaling System Group (DTSS). Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University: The Netherlands, 1999. Chang, C.J., Ho, J.L.Y., and Liao, W.M. "The effects of justification, task complexity and experience/training on problem-solving performance." Behavioral Research in Accounting 9 (1997): 98-116. Chaiken, S. "Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (1980): 752-766. Chew, A. and Greer, S. "Contrasting world views on accounting: Accountability and Aboriginal culture." Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 10 (1997): 276- 298. Church, B.K. "Auditors' use of confirmatory processes." Journal of Accounting Literature 9 (1990): 81-112. Church, B.K. "An examination of the effect that commitment to a hypothesis has on auditors' evaluations of confirming and disconfirming evidence." Contemporary Accounting Research 7 (1991): 513-534 Cloyd, C.B. "Performance in tax research tasks: The joint effects of knowledge and accountability." The Accounting Review 72 (1997): 111-131. Cloyd, C.B. and Spilker, B.C. "The influence of client preferences on tax professionals' search for judicial precedents, subsequent judgments and recommendations." The Accounting Review 74 (July 1999): 299-322. Cochran, W.G. and Cox, G.M. Experimental Designs. Second edition. New York: Wiley, 1957. Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T. Quasi-experimental Design: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Skokie, IL: Rand McNally, 1979. Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T., and Peracchio, L. "Quasi experimentation." In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, edited by Dunnette, M.D. and L. M. Hough. Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.: Palo Alto, California, 1990. Cooper, J. and Fazio, R. H. "A new look at dissonance theory." In Advances in experimental social psychology 17, edited by L. Berkowitz, 229-264. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1984. Coy, D. and Pratt, M. "An insight into accountability and politics in universities: a case study." Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 11 (1998): 540-561. Cuccia, A.D., Hackenbrack, K., and Nelson, M.W. "The ability of professional standards to mitigate aggressive reporting." The Accounting Review 70 (1995): 227- 248. Cushing, B.E. and Ahlawat, S.S. "Mitigation of recency bias in audit judgment: The effect of documentation." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 15 (1996): 110- 122. DeZoort, F.T. and Lord, A.T. "A review and synthesis of pressure effects research in accounting." Journal of Accounting Literature 16 (1997): 28-85. Dusseldorp, E. and Meulman, J. J. "Prediction in medicine by integrating regression trees into regression analysis with optimal scaling." Methods of Information in Medicine 40 (2001): 403-409. Einhorn, H. and Hogarth, M. "Behavioral decision theory: processes of judgment and choice." Annual Review of Psycholog y (1981): 53-88. Elias, N. "The effects of human asset statements on the investment decision: an experiment." Empirical Research in Accounting: Selected Studies (A Supplement to the Journal of Accounting Research (1972). Elliott, R. and Jacobson, P.D. "Costs and benefits of information disclosure." Accounting Horizons 8 (1994): 80-96. Emby, R. and Gibbins, M. "Good judgment in public accounting: Quality and justification." Contemporary Accounting Research 4 (1988): 287-313. Epstein, M.J. and Palepu, K.G. "What financial analysts want?" Strategic Finance. Institute of Management Accountants. (April 1999): 48-52. Ericson, K.A. and Simon, H.A. "Verbal reports as data." Psychological Review 87 (1987): 215-251. Ernst & Ernst. Social Responsibility Disclosure. Ernst & Ernst: U.S.A, 1978. Etzioni, A. The moral dimension. New York: Free Press, 1988. Festinger, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, 1957. Festinger, L. and Carlsmith, J.M. "Cognitive consequences of forced compliance." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 58 (1959): 203-210. Fischoff, B. "Debiasing." In Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, edited by D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A, Tversky. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1982. Fiske, S. T. and Taylor, S.E. Social cognition. New York: McGraw Hill, 1991. Folkman, S. "Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (1984): 839-852. Fox, F.V. and Staw, B.M. "The trapped administrator: The effects of job insecurity and policy resistance upon commitment to a course of action." Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (1979): 449-471. Gearin, M. and Khandelwal, S. "A true and fair view or mandatory standards?" Australian Accountant (June 1995): 12-16. Gibbins, M. and Newton, J.D. "An empirical exploration of complex accountability in public accounting." Journal of Accounting Research 32 (1994): 165-186. Glover, M.S. "The influence of time pressure and accountability on auditors' processing of nondiagnostic information." Journal of Accounting Research 35 (1997): 213-226. Gordon, M.E., Slade, L.A., and Schmitt, N. "The "science of sophomore" revisited: From conjecture to empiricism." Academy of Management Review 11 (1986): 191-207. Green, M.C., Visser, P. S., and Tetlock, P.E. "Coping with accountability crosspressures: Low-effort evasive tactics and high-effort quests for complex compromises." Personality and Social Psycholog By ulletin 26 (2000): 1380-1391. Gruenfeld, D.H. "Status, ideology, and integrative complexity on the U.S. Supreme Court: Rethinking the politics of political decision making." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 (1995): 5-20. Gruenfeld, D.H., Thomas-Hunt, M.C., and Kim, P.H. "Cognitive flexibility, communication strategy, and integrative complexity in groups: Public versus private reactions to majority and minority status." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 34 (1998): 202-226. Hackenbrack, K. "Implications of seemingly irrelevant evidence in audit judgment." Journal of Accounting Research 30 (1992): 126-136. Hackenbrack, K. and Nelson, M.W. "Auditors' incentives and their application of financial accounting standards." The Accounting Review 71 (1996): 43-59. Hackston, D. and Milne, M.J. "Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies." Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 9 (1996): 77-108. Hagafors, R. and Brehmer, B. "Does having to justify one's judgments change the nature of the judgment process?" Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 31 (1983): 223-232. Hammond, K.R. and Brehmer, B. "Quasi-rationality and distrust. Implications for international conflict." In Human Judgment and Social Interaction, edited by L. Rapport and D. Summers. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973. Hammond, K.R.and Summers, D.A. "Cognitive control." Psychological Review 79 (1972): 58-67. Harmon-Jones, E. and Mills, J. "An introduction to cognitive dissonance theory and an overview of current perspectives on the theory." In Cognitive Dissonance, edited by E. Harmon-Jones and J. Mills, 3-21. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 1999. Hattrup, K. and Ford, J.K. "The roles of information characteristics and accountability in moderating stereotype-driven processes during social decision making." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 63 (1995): 73-86. Henderson, S. and Henderson, E. "A note on the public interest and ethical behaviour." Australian Accounting Review 11 (2001): 68-72. Hendricks, J.A. "The impact of human resource accounting information on stock investment decisions: an empirical study." The Accounting Review (April 1976): 292- 305. Hoffman, V.B. and Patton, J.M. "Accountability, dilution effect, and conservatism in auditors' fraud judgments." Journal of Accounting Research 35 (1997): 227-237. Hogarth, R.M. Judgment and choice. Second edition. New York: Wiley, 1987. Hossain, M., Perera, H., and Rahman, A. "Disclosure in annual reports of New Zealand Companies." Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting (1995): 69-85. Houghton, K.A. and Hronsky, J.J.F. "The sharing of meaning between accounting students and members of the accounting profession." Accounting and Finance (November 1993): 131-147. Hronsky, J.J.F. and Houghton, K.A. "The meaning of a defined accounting concept: regulatory changes and the effect on auditor decision making." Accounting, Organizations and Society 26 (2001): 123-139. Hunter, J.E., Schmidt, F.L., and Jackson, G.B. Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1982. Institute of Chartered Accountants of New Zealand (ICANZ) – FRS 15: Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets. 1995. Institute of Chartered Accountants of New Zealand (ICANZ) – FRS 9: Information to be Disclosed in Financial Statements. 1995. Iselin, E.R. and Iskander, T.M. "Auditors' recognition and disclosure materiality thresholds: Their magnitude and the effects of industry." British Accounting Review 32 (2000): 289-309. Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R. and Wan, C.K. Interaction effects in multiple regression. Sage Publications, 1990. Jamal, K. "Commentary on: Auditor Judgments: The effects of the partner's views on decision outcomes and cognitive effort." Behavioral Research in Accounting 9 (1997): 176-181. Janis, I.L. and Mann, L. Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York: The Free Press, 1977 Jen nas, J. "Cognitive dissonance and resistance to change: the influence of commitment, confirmation and feedback on judgment usefulness of accounting systems." Accounting, Organizations and Society 26 (2001): 141-160. Jiambalvo, J. and Wilner, N. "Auditor evaluation of contingent claims." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 5 (1985): 1-11. Johnson, V.E. and Kaplan, S. E. "Experimental evidence on the effects of accountability on auditor judgments." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 10 (1991): 96-113. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. "Prospect Theory: An analysis of decisions under risk." Econometrica 47 (1979): 263-291. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982. Kandel, E. and Lazear, E. P. "Peer pressure and partnerships." Journal of Political Economy (August 1992): 801-817. Kelly, G.J. "Unregulated segment reporting: Australian evidence." British Accounting Review 26 (1994): 217-234. Kennedy, J. "Debiasing the curse of knowledge in audit judgment." The Accounting Review 70(1995): 249-273. Kennedy, J. "Debiasing audit judgment with accountability: A framework and experimental results." Journal of Accounting Research 30 (1993): 231-245. Kennedy, J., Mitchell, T., and Sefcik, S.E. "Disclosure of contingent environmental liabilities: Some unintended consequences?" Journal of Accounting Research 36 (1998): 257-277. Kiesler, C. A. The Psychology of Commitment: Experiments Linking Behavior to Belief New York: Academic Press, 1971. Knox, R. and Inkster, J. "Postdecision dissonance at post time." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8 (1968): 319-323. Koonce, L., Anderson, U., and Marchant, G. "Justifications of decisions in auditing." Journal of Accounting Research 33 (1995): 369-384. Kritzer, H.M. "Using categorical regression to analyze multivariate contingency tables." In New Tools for Social Scientists: Advances and Applications in Research Methods, edited by W. B. Berry and M.S. Lewis-Beck, 157-201. Sage, 1986. Lerner, J. S. and Tetlock, P.E. "Accounting for the effect of accountability." Psychological Bulletin 125 (1999): 255-275. Levitt, A. "The "Numbers Game'. www.isac.org.uk (Accessed September 28, 1998). Libby, R., Bloomfield, R., and Nelson, M.W. "Experimental research in financial accounting." Accounting, Organizations and Society 27(2002): 775-810. Libby, R. and Luft, J. "Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment." Accounting, Organizations and Society 18 (1993): 425-450. Libby, R. and Lipe, M. "Incentive effects and the cognitive processes involved in accounting judgments." Journal of Accounting Research 30 (1992): 249-273. Linder, D., Cooper, J., and Jones, E. "Decision freedom as a determinant of the role of incentive magnitude on attitude change." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 6 (1967): 245-254. Lindsay, R M. "Reconsidering the status of tests of significance: An alternative criterion of adequacy." Accounting, Organizations, and Society 20 (1995): 35-53. Linton, R. The cultural background of personality. NY: Appleton-Century Co., 1945. Lipe, M.G. "Commentary on: The effects of justification, task complexity and experience/training on problem-solving performance." Behavioral Research in Accounting 9 (1997): 117-122. Liyanarachchi, G.A. and Milne, M.J. "Comparing the investment decisions of accounting practitioners and students: An empirical investigation into the adequacy of students as surrogates for accounting practitioners." Working Paper Series. Department of Accountancy and Business Law, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, (2002). Locke, E.A. Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings. ed. Lexington Books, 1986. Lont, D. "An examination of requirements for disclosure of unspecified operating expenses in New Zealand." accounting forum 21 (1997): 149-174. Lont, D. "Unspecified Operating Expense Disclosure Requirements in New Zealand. Has FRS 9 made a difference?" Pacific Accounting Review, (Forthcoming). Long, J.S. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1997. Lord, A. T. "Pressure: A methodological consideration for behavioral research in accounting." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 11 (1992): 89-108. Markman, K.D. and Tetlock, P.E. "I couldn't have known': Accountability, forseeability and counterfactual denials of responsibility." British Journal of Social Psychology 39 (2000): 313-325. Mautz, R.K. and Sharaf, H.A. The Philosophy of Auditing. American Accounting Association, Sarasota, Florida, 1961. McAllister, D., Mitchell, T.R., and Beach, L.R. "The contingency model for selection of decision strategies: An empirical test of the effects of significance, accountability, and reversibility." Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 24 (1979): 228- 244. McGrath, J.E. "Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas." In Judgment calls in research, edited by J.E. McGrath, J. Martin, and R.A. Kulka, 69- 102. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1982. McGrath, J.E., Martin, J., and Kulka, R.A. Judgment calls in research. ed. Sage Publications, 1982. Milne, M.J., Owen, D.L. and Tilt, C.A. "Corporate Environmental Reporting: Are New Zealand companies being left behind?" University of Auckland Business Review 3 (2001): 24-36. Miller, G. "The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information." Psychological Review (March 1956): 81-97. Morton, J.E. and Felix, W.L. "Assessing control risk: Effects of procedural differences on auditor consensus." In Auditing Symposium X: Proceedings of the 1991 Delloitte & Touche/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems, 109-131, edited by R. P. Srivastava. Lawrence: School of Business, University of Kansas, (1991). Murphy, R. "The effects of task characteristics on covariation assessment: The impact of accountability and judgment frame." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 60 (1994): 139-155. Newell, A., and Simon, H.A. Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1972. Nisbett, R.E., and Ross, L. Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. Nisbett, R. E., Zukier, H., and Lemley, R.E. "The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic information." Cognitive Psychology (April 1981): 248-277. Orme, J.G. & Buehler, C. "Introduction to multiple regression for categorical and limited dependent variables." Social Work Research 25 (2001): 49-68 Payne, J. "Contingent decision behavior." Psychological Bulletin 92 (1982): 382-402. Payne, J.W. "Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis." Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16 (1976): 366-387. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R., and Johnson, E.J. "Adaptive strategy selection in decision making." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14 (1988): 534-552. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R., and Johnson, E.J. The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Peecher, M.E. "The influence of auditors' justification processes on their decisions: A cognitive model and experimental evidence." Journal of Accounting Research 34 (1996): 125-140. Peecher, M.E. and Kleinmuntz, D. N. "Experimental evidence on the effects of accountability on auditor judgments." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 10 (1991): 108-113. Petty, R.E. and Brock, T.C. "Effects of Barnum personality assessments on cognitive behavior." Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 47 (1979): 201-203. Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T. "Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration." Psychological Bulletin 107 (1990): 367-374. Ponemon, L.A. "Auditor underreporting of time and moral reasoning: An experimental lab study." Contemporary Accounting Research 9 (1992): 171-189. Power, M. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford University Press: New York, 1997. Quilliam, W.C. "Examining the effects of accountability on auditors' valuation decisions." Working paper, University of South Florida. (1993). Roberts, J. "The possibilities of accountability." Accounting, Organizations and Society 16 (1991): 355-368. Roberts, J. and Scapens, R. "Accounting systems and systems of accountability." Accounting, Organizations and Society (1985). Rosenthal, R. and Rosnow, R.L. Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. Second Edition. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1991. Rozelle, R.M. and Baxter, J.C. "Influence of role pressures on the perceiver: Judgments of videotaped interviews varying judge accountability and responsibility." Journal of Applied Psychology 66 (1981): 437-441. Runkel, P.J. and McGrath, J.E. Research on Human Behavior: A Systematic Guide to Method. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1972. Salterio, S. "The effects of precedents and client position on auditors' financial accounting policy judgment." Accounting, Organizations and Society 21 (1996): 467- 486. Salterio, S. and Koonce, L. "The persuasiveness of audit evidence: The case of accounting policy decisions." Accounting, Organizations and Society 22 (1997): 573- 587. Schroder, H. M., Driver, M.J., and Streufert, S. Human Information Processing: Individuals and Groups Functioning in Complex Social Situations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1967. Schulz, A.K-D. "Experimental research method in a management accounting context." Accounting and Finance 39 (1999): 29-51. Schwan, E.S. "The effects of human resource accounting data on financial decisions: an empirical test." Accounting, Organizations and Society 1 (1976): 219-237. Shotter, J. "Vico, moral worlds, accountability, and personhood." In Indegigenous psychologies: The anthropology of the self edited by Heelas, P. and A. Lock. London: Academic Press, 1981. Sekaran, U. Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. Second edition New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1992. Seligman, M.E.P. Helplessness. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1975. Semin, G.R. and Manstead, A.S.R. The Accountability of Conduct. Academic Press: London, 1983, Siegel, S. and Castellan, Jr. N.J. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Second edition. Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 1988. Siegel-Jacobs, K. and Yates, J.F. "Effects of procedural and outcome accountability on judgment quality." Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 65 (1996): 1-17. Simon, H. Models of man: Social and rational. New York: Wiley, 1957. Simon, H.A. "Rationality as process and as product of thought." Economic Association (1978): 1-16. Simon, H.A. "The scientist as a problem solver." In Complex information Processing. edited by D. Klahr and K. Kotovsky. 375-398. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assocaites, Hillsdale, 1989. Simon, H.A. "Invariants of human behavior." Annual Review of Psychology 41 (1990): 1-19. Simonson, I. and Nye, P. "The effect of accountability on susceptibility to decision errors." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 51 (1992): 416-446. Simonson, I. and Staw, B.M. "Deescalation strategies: A comparison of techniques for reducing commitment to losing courses of action." Journal of Applied Psychology 77 (1992): 419-426. Smith, J.F. and Kida, T. "Heuristics and biases: Expertise and task realism in auditing." Psychological Bulletin 109 (1991): 472-489. Spilker, B.C. "The effects of time pressure and knowledge on key word selection behavior in tax research." The Accounting Review 70 (1995): 49-70. SPSS Inc. SPSS Categories 8.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc., 1999. Staw, B.M. "Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action." Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16 (1976): 27-44. Staw, B.M. "The escalation of commitment to a course of action." Academy of Management Review 6 (1981): 577-587. Staw, B.M. and Ross, J. "Behavior in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions." In Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol. 9. edited by L.L. Cummings and B.M. Staw.39-78. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc., 1987. Staw, B.M. "Rationality and justification in organizational life." In Information and Cognition in Organizations. edited by L.L. Cummings and B.M. Staw. 53-88. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc., 1990. Steele, C. M. "The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self." In Advances in experimental social psychology 21. edited by L. Berkowitz. 261- 302. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1988. Sternberg, R.J. "Intelligence as developing expertise." Contemporary Educational Psychology 24 (1999): 359-375. Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P.E., and Streufert, S. "Conceptual/integrative complexity." In Motivation and Personality: Handbook of Thematic Content Analysis. edited by C.P. Smith. 393-400.Cambridge University Press, 1992. Svenson, 0. and Maule, J.A. Time Pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. New York: Plenum Press, 1993. Tan, H.T. "Effects of expectations, prior involvement, and review awareness on memory for audit evidence and judgment." Journal of Accounting Research 33 (1995): 113-135. Tan, C.E.L., Jubb, C.A., and Houghton, K.A. "Auditor judgments: The effects of the partner's views on decision outcomes and cognitive effort." Behavioral Research in Accounting 9 (1997): 157 -175. Tan, H-T. and Kao, A. "Accountability effects on auditors' performance: The influence of knowledge, problem-solving ability, and task complexity." Journal of Accounting Research 37 (1999): 209-223. Taylor, S. "The interface of cognitive and social psychology." In Cognition, Social behavior, and the environment. edited by J.H. Harvey. Hillsdale, N.J.:Erlbaum, 1980. Tegar, A. Too much invested to quit. New York: Pergamon Press, 1980. Tetlock, P.E. "Accountability and complexity of thought." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (1983a): 74-83. Tetlock, P.E. "Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions." Social Psychology Quarterly 46 (1983b). 285-292. Tetlock, P.E. "Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice." In Research in Organizational Behavior. edited by B.M Staw and L. L Cummings. 297-332. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1985a. Tetlock, P.E. "Accountability: A social check on the fundamental error." Social Psychology Quarterly 48 (1985b). 227-236. Tetlock, P.E. "The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model." Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25 (1992): 331- 376. Tetlock, P.E. "Close-call counterfactuals and belief-system defenses: I was not almost wrong but I was almost right." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (1998): 639-652. Tetlock, P.E., Armor, D., and Peterson, R.S. "The slavery debate in antebellum america – cognitive-style, value conflict, and the limits of compromise." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 (1994): 115-126. Tetlock, P.E. and Boettger, R. "Accountability amplifies the status quo effect when change creates victims." Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 7 (1994): 1-23. Tetlock, P.E. and Boettger, R. "Accountability: A social magnifier of the dilution effect." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (1989): 388-398. Tetlock, P.E. and Kim, J.I. "Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (1987): 700-709. Tetlock, P.E., Skitka, L., and Boettger, R. "Social cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: Conformity, complexity, and bolstering." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (1989): 632-640. Tilt, C.A. "The influence of external pressure groups on corporate social disclosure: some empirical evidence." Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 7 (1994): 47-72. Trotman, K.T. Research Methods for Judgment and Decision Making Studies in Auditing. Coopers & Lybrand: Australia, 1996. Tversky, A. "Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice." Psychological Review 79 (1972): 281-299. Tversky, A. "Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability." Cognitive Psychology 5 (1973): 207-232. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. "Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases." Science 185 (1974): 1124-1131. Wallace;W.A. Accounting research methods: do the facts speak for themselves? Richard. D. Irwin, Inc., 1991. Watson, D.J.H. "Students as surrogates in behavioral business research: Some comments." Accounting Review (July 1974): 530-537. Weick, K.E. "Cognitive processes in organizations." In Information and Cognition in Organizations. edited by L. L Cummings and B. M. Staw. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1990. Weick, K.E. "Reduction of cognitive dissonance through task enhancement and effort expenditure." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 68 (1964): 533-549. Weldon, E. and Mustari, E.L. "Felt dispensability in groups of coactors: The effects of shared responsibility and explicit anonymity on cognitive effort." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 41 (1988): 330-351. Whittington, G. "Trust in financial reporting." Pacific Accounting Review 11 (1999/2000): 181-188. Windsor, C. "Auditors' predisposition to provide fair judgments: Australian evidence of Auditors' level of moral reasoning." Australian Accounting Review 12 (2002): 51- 58. Wolk, H.I., Vaughan, T.M., and Clapham, S. E. "Accountability and decision making: Analyzing corporate responses to the exposure draft for postretirement benefits other than pensions." Advances in Public Interest in Accounting 7 (1998): 263-293. Wrubel, J., Benner, P., and Lazarus, R.S. "Social competence from the perspective of stress and coping." In Social competence. edited by J. Wine and M. Smye. 61-99. New York: Guilford, 1981. Yates, J.F. Judgment and decision making. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990. Zajonc, R.B. "The process of cognitive tuning in communications." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 61 (1960): 159-167. Zetterberg, H. L. "Complaint actions".Acta Socialogica 2 (1957). 188-192. Zipf, G. K. Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1949.en_NZ
 Find in your library

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item is not available in full-text via OUR Archive.

If you would like to read this item, please apply for an inter-library loan from the University of Otago via your local library.

If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record