Ph.D. Supervision as a House Divided: Implications for Policy
Hamlin, Robert Philip
Cite this item:
Hamlin, R. P. (2009). Ph.D. Supervision as a House Divided: Implications for Policy (Discussion Paper). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/2075
Permanent link to OUR Archive version:
http://hdl.handle.net/10523/2075
Abstract:
This article examines the pastoral and academic implications of the inductive and deductive approaches to supervision described in the working paper: ‘Ph.D. supervision, a house divided?”. The observations are based on the writer’s several years’ experience of running a Ph.D. programme of some 40+ students. It concludes that, for a Commerce discipline such as Marketing, the deductive approach offers superior pastoral and academic outcomes. It then makes a series of policy recommendations.
Date:
2009
Research Type:
Discussion Paper
Collections
- Marketing collection [165]
- Discussion Paper [447]