Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHamlin, Robert Philip
dc.date.available2011-12-16T01:26:20Z
dc.date.copyright2009
dc.identifier.citationHamlin, R. P. (2009). Ph.D. Supervision as a House Divided: Implications for Policy (Discussion Paper). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/2075en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10523/2075
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the pastoral and academic implications of the inductive and deductive approaches to supervision described in the working paper: ‘Ph.D. supervision, a house divided?”. The observations are based on the writer’s several years’ experience of running a Ph.D. programme of some 40+ students. It concludes that, for a Commerce discipline such as Marketing, the deductive approach offers superior pastoral and academic outcomes. It then makes a series of policy recommendations.en_NZ
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.titlePh.D. Supervision as a House Divided: Implications for Policyen_NZ
dc.typeDiscussion Paperen_NZ
otago.schoolMarketingen_NZ
otago.openaccessOpen
 Find in your library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record